510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Bard Hydrophilic Coated Guide Wires

K993000510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 2, 199956-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.1330

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

C.R. Bard, Inc. · DQX Wire, Guide, Catheter

Cleared on Nov 2, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K974713 (C.R. Bard, Inc., 1998) after a 56-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1998. 1 later device descends from it.

Decided
Nov 2, 1999
Review
56 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DQX
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K974713 (1998). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2012: 1 descendant clearedK974713 · Bard Hydrophillic Coated Guide Wire · C.R. Bard, Inc. · 19981995200020052010201520202025
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant K974713 · Bard Hydrophillic Coated Guide Wire · C.R. Bard, Inc. · 19980
  1. Root · 1 generation backK974713 Bard Hydrophillic Coated Guide WireC.R. Bard, Inc. · 1998
  2. This deviceK993000 Bard Hydrophilic Coated Guide WiresC.R. Bard, Inc. · 1999
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK120119 Sunmed Guide WireSunny Medical Device (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. · 2012

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K120119Sunmed Guide WireSunny Medical Device (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. · 2012 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K974713Bard Hydrophillic Coated Guide WireC.R. Bard, Inc.1998—
0 (this device)K993000Bard Hydrophilic Coated Guide WiresC.R. Bard, Inc.1999—
+1K120119Sunmed Guide WireSunny Medical Device (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.2012—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
201210
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K993000, 1998–2012Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DQX? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DQX device

  1. #1 K213854 SavvyWirescore 15.7 · 10 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (5)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K974713Bard Hydrophillic Coated Guide Wire
Summary page 2
…Technological Characteristics Summary: The Bard Hydrophilic Coated Guide Wire discussed in this 510(k) is similar the Bard Hydrophilic Coated Guide Wires discussed in K974713 which were similar to the Terumo Glidewire regarding materials and construction, and is similar to Bard Silk Guide Wires, Bard An…
C.R. Bard, Inc.1998—
*—Bard Preamendment Angiographic Guide Wires
Named without a submission number
—
*—Bard PTCA Steerable Standard Guide Wire
Named without a submission number
—
*—Bard Silk Guide Wire
Named without a submission number
—
*—Terumo Glidewire
Named without a submission number
—

Also cleared against K974713: 1 other device →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K120119Sunmed Guide WireSunny Medical Device (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.20120

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K120119 (Sunny Medical Device (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., 2012) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K974713.

How does its category compare?

All DQX devices

DQX Wire, Guide, Catheter: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DQX

10in 2025

2007: 142008: 192009: 182010: 212011: 182012: 202013: 182014: 182015: 152016: 142017: 192018: 192019: 132020: 142021: 62022: 152023: 102024: 112025: 102026 (partial year): 12
2007high 21 (2010) · low 6 (2021)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DQX

177in 2025

2007: 85 days median2008: 87 days median2009: 87 days median2010: 63 days median2011: 43 days median2012: 62 days median2013: 119 days median2014: 103 days median2015: 112 days median2016: 179 days median2017: 85 days median2018: 114 days median2019: 173 days median2020: 106 days median2021: 161 days median2022: 212 days median2023: 136 days median2024: 134 days median2025: 177 days median2026 (partial year): 145 days median
2007high 212 (2022) · low 43 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DQX

3in 2024

2007: 122008: 72009: 492010: 342011: 32012: 52013: 7, 4 Class I2015: 12016: 2, 2 Class I2017: 172018: 92019: 22020: 1, 1 Class I2024: 32026 (partial year): 4, 1 Class I
2007high 49 (2009) · low 0 (2014)2026

Class I (8 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DQX

2,178in 2025

2007: 7602008: 7152009: 6872010: 9872011: 1,3112012: 1,3372013: 1,4742014: 1,3232015: 1,3232016: 1,4662017: 1,5242018: 1,7372019: 1,6792020: 1,5362021: 1,7132022: 1,6472023: 2,0682024: 2,2102025: 2,178
2007high 2,210 (2024) · low 687 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DQX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007148512760
200819877715
2009188749687
2010216334987
2011184331,311
2012206251,337
2013181197 (4)1,474
20141810301,323
20151511211,323
2016141792 (2)1,466
20171985171,524
20181911491,737
20191317321,679
2020141061 (1)1,536
2021616101,713
20221521201,647
20231013602,068
20241113432,210
20251017702,178
2026121454 (1)—

What is it indicated for?

The Bard Hydrophilic Coated Angiography Guide Wires are indicated for percutaneous entry into a vessel using the Seldinger technique.

The Bard Hydrophilic Coated Angioplasty (PTCA) Guide Wires are steerable guide wires that are used for the introduction and placement of diagnostic or interventional devices in the coronary or peripheral vasculature and may be used to reach and cross a target lesion.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K993000: Bard Hydrophilic Coated Guide Wires.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K993000

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026