510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Duracon Inset Patella, 25MM

K993692510(k) SpecialCleared Dec 2, 199930-day reviewClass II21 CFR 888.3560

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · JWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer

Cleared on Dec 2, 1999 as substantially equivalent to K961482 (Howmedica Corp., 1996) and 1 other predicate after a 30-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1996.

Decided
Dec 2, 1999
Review
30 days
Class
Class II
Product code
JWH
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K961482 (1996). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1997: 1 other ancestorK961482 · Duracon Inset Patella with Central Peg · Howmedica Corp. · 1996199619982000
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K961482 · Duracon Inset Patella with Central Peg · Howmedica Corp. · 19960
  1. Root · 1 generation backK961482 Duracon Inset Patella with Central PegHowmedica Corp. · 1996
  2. This deviceK993692 Duracon Inset Patella, 25MMHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · 1999
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K961482Duracon Inset Patella with Central PegHowmedica Corp.1996—
0 (this device)K993692Duracon Inset Patella, 25MMHowmedica Osteonics Corp.1999—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199710
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K993692, 1996–1999Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in JWH? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new JWH device

  1. #1 K221479 Persona Personalized Knee Systemscore 22.4 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K961482Duracon Inset Patella with Central Peg
Summary page 1
…ted prosthesis. Predicate Device Identification The Duracon Inset Patellar Component, in sizes 27, 29, 31, and 33mm, were determined Substantially Equivalent via 510(k) #K961482. They were then cleared in a Duration-stabilized version via K965173. This Special 510(k) covers an additional size component: 2…
Howmedica Corp.1996—
*K965173Duration Stabilized Uhmwpe Knee Components
Summary page 1
…llar Component, in sizes 27, 29, 31, and 33mm, were determined Substantially Equivalent via 510(k) #K961482. They were then cleared in a Duration-stabilized version via K965173. This Special 510(k) covers an additional size component: 25mm. Page i Duracon Inset Patellar Components: Additi…
Howmedica Corp.1997—

Also cleared against K961482: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K961482.

How does its category compare?

All JWH devices

JWH Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Polymer/Metal/Polymer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · JWH

20in 2025

2007: 182008: 172009: 112010: 192011: 252012: 332013: 312014: 332015: 272016: 182017: 252018: 252019: 282020: 222021: 242022: 172023: 202024: 192025: 202026 (partial year): 12
2007high 33 (2012) · low 11 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · JWH

55in 2025

2007: 74 days median2008: 81 days median2009: 168 days median2010: 85 days median2011: 87 days median2012: 85 days median2013: 128 days median2014: 98 days median2015: 87 days median2016: 88 days median2017: 118 days median2018: 90 days median2019: 133 days median2020: 59 days median2021: 61 days median2022: 56 days median2023: 57 days median2024: 89 days median2025: 55 days median2026 (partial year): 63 days median
2007high 168 (2009) · low 55 (2025)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · JWH

2in 2025

2007: 142008: 102009: 1092010: 322011: 272012: 852013: 312014: 132015: 112016: 172017: 612018: 142019: 52020: 22021: 82022: 122023: 672024: 72025: 22026 (partial year): 4
2007high 109 (2009) · low 2 (2020)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · JWH

9,306in 2025

2007: 1,3052008: 1,4832009: 1,8702010: 3,2862011: 5,1332012: 5,2032013: 6,1352014: 6,7222015: 6,8812016: 7,5862017: 12,2632018: 14,0712019: 14,9872020: 12,5922021: 9,4082022: 8,3642023: 8,9472024: 10,8282025: 9,306
2007high 14,987 (2019) · low 1,305 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code JWH, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071874141,305
20081781101,483
2009111681091,870
20101985323,286
20112587275,133
20123385855,203
201331128316,135
20143398136,722
20152787116,881
20161888177,586
2017251186112,263
201825901414,071
201928133514,987
20202259212,592
2021246189,408
20221756128,364
20232057678,947
20241989710,828
2025205529,306
202612634—

What is it indicated for?

The subject devices are single use components, intended for cemented use only. They are intended for use in conjunction with associated Duracon femoral components as part of cemented total knee replacement surgery. Indications for use, in keeping with those of other commercially-available, Class II total knee devices, are as follows: Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis or avascular necrosis. Rheumatoid…

Read the full statement (95 words)

The subject devices are single use components, intended for cemented use only. They are intended for use in conjunction with associated Duracon femoral components as part of cemented total knee replacement surgery. Indications for use, in keeping with those of other commercially-available, Class II total knee devices, are as follows:

Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis or avascular necrosis.

Rheumatoid arthritis.

Correction of functional deformity.

Revision procedures where other treatments have failed.

Post-traumatic loss of knee joint anatomy, particularly when there is patello-femoral erosion, dysfunction or prior patellectomy.

Irreparable fracture of the knee.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K993692: Duracon Inset Patella, 25MM.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K993692

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026