510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Liga-Loop Suture Applicator

K993695510(k) TraditionalCleared Apr 13, 2000163-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4830

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Hysterx, Inc. · GAL Suture, Absorbable, Natural

Cleared on Apr 13, 2000 as substantially equivalent to K950126 (Advanced Surgical, Inc., 1995) and 1 other predicate after a 163-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1994. 5 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Apr 13, 2000
Review
163 days
Class
Class II
Product code
GAL
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K931994 (1994). 2 ancestors in all. 5 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1995: 1 other ancestor2006: 1 descendant cleared2009: 1 descendant cleared2008: 1 descendant cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant clearedK931994 · Resectoscope Sheath · Olympus Corp. · 19941990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 2 descendants3 generations forward: 1 descendant4 generations forward: 1 descendant K931994 · Resectoscope Sheath · Olympus Corp. · 19940
  1. Root · 1 generation backK931994 Resectoscope SheathOlympus Corp. · 1994
  2. This deviceK993695 Liga-Loop Suture ApplicatorHysterx, Inc. · 2000
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 4 of its ownK060721 Lariat Loop ApplicatorSentreheart · 2006
  4. Descendant · 2 generations on · 2 of its ownK090385 Lariat II Suture Delivery DeviceSentreheart, Inc. · 2009
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 1 of its ownK142241 LARIAT sulture Delivery DeviceSentreheart, Inc. · 2014
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 0 of its ownK153096 LARIAT RS Suture Delivery DeviceSentreheart, Inc. · 2015
  7. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK073096 Anchorage Closure DeviceEpitek, Inc. · 2008

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 5 · See all
  • K060721Lariat Loop ApplicatorSentreheart · 2006 · cites it directly4descendants
  • K090385Lariat II Suture Delivery DeviceSentreheart, Inc. · 2009 · 2 generations on2descendants
  • K142241LARIAT sulture Delivery DeviceSentreheart, Inc. · 2014 · 3 generations on1descendant
  • K153096LARIAT RS Suture Delivery DeviceSentreheart, Inc. · 2015 · 4 generations on0descendants
  • K073096Anchorage Closure DeviceEpitek, Inc. · 2008 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K931994Resectoscope SheathOlympus Corp.1994—
0 (this device)K993695Liga-Loop Suture ApplicatorHysterx, Inc.2000—
+1K060721Lariat Loop ApplicatorSentreheart2006—
+2K090385Lariat II Suture Delivery DeviceSentreheart, Inc.2009—
+3K142241LARIAT sulture Delivery DeviceSentreheart, Inc.2014—
+4K153096LARIAT RS Suture Delivery DeviceSentreheart, Inc.2015—
+2K073096Anchorage Closure DeviceEpitek, Inc.2008—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199510

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200610
200810
200910
201410
201510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K993695, 1994–2015Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in GAL? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K950126Endoscopic Ligation Device, Ligator Handle, Ligator Cartridge
Summary page 1
…or legally marketed device or devices to which substantial equivalence is being claimed: a. Company: Advanced Surgical, Inc. Device: Endoscopic Ligation Device 510(k): K950126 Date Cleared: April 13, 1995 b. Company: Olympus Corporation Device: Resectoscope Sheath 510¢k): K931994/A LIGA-LOQP Suture Appli…
Advanced Surgical, Inc.1995—
*K931994Resectoscope Sheath
Summary page 1
…vanced Surgical, Inc. Device: Endoscopic Ligation Device 510(k): K950126 Date Cleared: April 13, 1995 b. Company: Olympus Corporation Device: Resectoscope Sheath 510¢k): K931994/A LIGA-LOQP Suture Applicator K993695 Summary of Safety and Effectiveness March 30, 2000 lof4 Page 3/5 Date Cle…
Olympus Corp.1994—

What descends from it? (5)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K060721Lariat Loop ApplicatorSentreheart20064

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K060721 (Sentreheart, 2006) has gone furthest, with 4 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All GAL devices

GAL Suture, Absorbable, Natural: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · GAL

1in 2015

2008: 12015: 1
2007high 1 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · GAL

Too few GAL 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · GAL

1in 2019

2019: 1
2007high 1 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · GAL

117in 2025

2007: 132008: 62009: 252010: 572011: 362012: 272013: 322014: 1572015: 1372016: 872017: 1332018: 2462019: 2292020: 1092021: 1202022: 1302023: 1212024: 1612025: 117
2007high 246 (2018) · low 6 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code GAL, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—013
20081—06
20090—025
20100—057
20110—036
20120—027
20130—032
20140—0157
20151—0137
20160—087
20170—0133
20180—0246
20190—1229
20200—0109
20210—0120
20220—0130
20230—0121
20240—0161
20250—0117
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The LIGA-LOOP Suture Applicator is intended for use in the suturing of soft tissue and ligation of blood vessels during open and guidance-assisted surgical procedures. The LIGA-LOOP Suture Applicator with polyglycolic acid (PGA) suture and the LIGA-LOOP Suture Applicator with gut suture (plain and chromic) are intended for the same use, excluding cardiovascular and neurological procedures.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K993695: Liga-Loop Suture Applicator.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K993695

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026