510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class II · 2023

Titan Inflatable Penile Prosthesis

P000006PMAApproved Jul 14, 2000178-day reviewClass III21 CFR 876.3350Recalls 18

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Coloplast Corp. · FHW Device, Impotence, Mechanical/Hydraulic

Approved on Jul 14, 2000 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 178-day review. It has been recalled 18 times.

Decided
Jul 14, 2000
Review
178 days
Class
Class III
Product code
FHW
Recalls
18

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P000006 has 69 supplements since 2002: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2002: 12003: 22004: 12005: 12008: 62009: 22010: 42011: 52012: 22013: 52014: 52015: 72017: 22018: 22019: 32020: 42021: 22022: 32023: 32024: 32025: 22026: 4
2002high 7 (2015) · low 0 (2006)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20021
20032
20041
20051
20086
20092
20104
20115
20122
20135
20145
20157
20172
20182
20193
20204
20212
20223
20233
20243
20252
20264
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P000006, 2002–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FHW? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1362-2023Process change controlA decrease in wall thickness has the potential for a premature pump failure, compared to a pump with standard wall thickness, based on the number of interactions with the pump to inflate and deflate the penile prosthesis.
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1360-2023Process change controlA decrease in wall thickness has the potential for a premature pump failure, compared to a pump with standard wall thickness, based on the number of interactions with the pump to inflate and deflate the penile prosthesis.
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1363-2023Process change controlA decrease in wall thickness has the potential for a premature pump failure, compared to a pump with standard wall thickness, based on the number of interactions with the pump to inflate and deflate the penile prosthesis.
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1372-2023Process change controlA decrease in wall thickness has the potential for a premature pump failure, compared to a pump with standard wall thickness, based on the number of interactions with the pump to inflate and deflate the penile prosthesis.
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1370-2023Process change controlA decrease in wall thickness has the potential for a premature pump failure, compared to a pump with standard wall thickness, based on the number of interactions with the pump to inflate and deflate the penile prosthesis.
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1366-2023Process change controlA decrease in wall thickness has the potential for a premature pump failure, compared to a pump with standard wall thickness, based on the number of interactions with the pump to inflate and deflate the penile prosthesis.
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1368-2023Process change controlA decrease in wall thickness has the potential for a premature pump failure, compared to a pump with standard wall thickness, based on the number of interactions with the pump to inflate and deflate the penile prosthesis.
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1359-2023Process change controlA decrease in wall thickness has the potential for a premature pump failure, compared to a pump with standard wall thickness, based on the number of interactions with the pump to inflate and deflate the penile prosthesis.
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1374-2023Process change controlXXX
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1375-2023Process change controlA decrease in wall thickness has the potential for a premature pump failure, compared to a pump with standard wall thickness, based on the number of interactions with the pump to inflate and deflate the penile prosthesis.
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1365-2023Process change controlA decrease in wall thickness has the potential for a premature pump failure, compared to a pump with standard wall thickness, based on the number of interactions with the pump to inflate and deflate the penile prosthesis.
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1364-2023Process change controlA decrease in wall thickness has the potential for a premature pump failure, compared to a pump with standard wall thickness, based on the number of interactions with the pump to inflate and deflate the penile prosthesis.
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1371-2023Process change controlA decrease in wall thickness has the potential for a premature pump failure, compared to a pump with standard wall thickness, based on the number of interactions with the pump to inflate and deflate the penile prosthesis.
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1367-2023Process change controlA decrease in wall thickness has the potential for a premature pump failure, compared to a pump with standard wall thickness, based on the number of interactions with the pump to inflate and deflate the penile prosthesis.
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1369-2023Process change controlA decrease in wall thickness has the potential for a premature pump failure, compared to a pump with standard wall thickness, based on the number of interactions with the pump to inflate and deflate the penile prosthesis.
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1373-2023Process change controlA decrease in wall thickness has the potential for a premature pump failure, compared to a pump with standard wall thickness, based on the number of interactions with the pump to inflate and deflate the penile prosthesis.
Mar 1, 2023Class IIZ-1361-2023Process change controlA decrease in wall thickness has the potential for a premature pump failure, compared to a pump with standard wall thickness, based on the number of interactions with the pump to inflate and deflate the penile prosthesis.
Oct 6, 2009Not classifiedZ-0171-2010Process controlColoplast determined that a portion of Titan OTR pumps were manufactured using a process that where validation activities were not completed. The Titan OTR pumps were made to our standard product specifications and have passed all…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All FHW devices

FHW Device, Impotence, Mechanical/Hydraulic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · FHW

2in 2025

2008: 62009: 22010: 42011: 52012: 22013: 52014: 52015: 102016: 12017: 22018: 22019: 32020: 42021: 22022: 32023: 32024: 32025: 22026 (partial year): 4
2007high 10 (2015) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FHW

Too few FHW 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · FHW

1in 2021

2009: 12020: 12021: 1
2007high 1 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FHW

2,537in 2025

2007: 112008: 162009: 152010: 142011: 112012: 112013: 192014: 272015: 92016: 72017: 5122018: 1,6772019: 4,0102020: 3,5612021: 3,7152022: 3,2022023: 3,6732024: 4,0762025: 2,537
2007high 4,076 (2024) · low 7 (2016)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FHW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—011
20086—016
20092—115
20104—014
20115—011
20122—011
20135—019
20145—027
201510—09
20161—07
20172—0512
20182—01,677
20193—04,010
20204—13,561
20212—13,715
20223—03,202
20233—03,673
20243—04,076
20252—02,537
20264—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P000006: Titan Inflatable Penile Prosthesis.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P000006

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026