510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class II · 2025

Medtronic Insync (TM) Biventrical Pacing System

P010015PMAApproved Aug 28, 2001179-day reviewClass IIIRecalls 10

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medtronic, Inc. · LWP Implantable Pulse Generator, Pacemaker (Non-Crt)

Approved on Aug 28, 2001 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 179-day review. It has been recalled 10 times.

Decided
Aug 28, 2001
Review
179 days
Class
Class III
Product code
LWP
Recalls
10

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P010015 has 574 supplements since 2001: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2001: 22002: 42003: 52004: 22005: 22006: 82007: 82008: 182009: 192010: 262011: 432012: 322013: 402014: 302015: 322016: 282017: 352018: 362019: 372020: 372021: 272022: 232023: 182024: 252025: 212026: 16
2001high 43 (2011) · low 2 (2001)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20012
20024
20035
20042
20052
20068
20078
200818
200919
201026
201143
201232
201340
201430
201532
201628
201735
201836
201937
202037
202127
202223
202318
202425
202521
202616
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P010015, 2001–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LWP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jun 17, 2025Class IIZ-2128-2025Software designA software update for Medtronic CareLink SmartSync Device Manager (SmartSync) is now available. The update eliminates the potential display of an erroneous electrical reset (pop-up) message upon interrogation with a SmartSync Device…
Jun 17, 2025Class IIZ-2127-2025Software designA software update for Medtronic CareLink SmartSync Device Manager (SmartSync) is now available. The update eliminates the potential display of an erroneous electrical reset (pop-up) message upon interrogation with a SmartSync Device…
Jun 4, 2020Class IIZ-2513-2020Software designThere is a rare communication sequence during the first device interrogation with a SmartSync Device Manager that may result in the temporary suspension of some device features (i.e., battery measurements, Capture Management", Atrial Lead…
Jun 4, 2020Class IIZ-2512-2020Software designThere is a rare communication sequence during the first device interrogation with a SmartSync Device Manager that may result in the temporary suspension of some device features (i.e., battery measurements, Capture Management", Atrial Lead…
Jun 4, 2020Class IIZ-2511-2020Software designThere is a rare communication sequence during the first device interrogation with a SmartSync Device Manager that may result in the temporary suspension of some device features (i.e., battery measurements, Capture Management", Atrial Lead…
Jun 21, 2018Class IIZ-2414-2018Device DesignPotential for a device reset to occur in Percepta CRT-P MRI SureScan and Percepta Quad CRT-P MRI SureScan due to a timing interaction between the EffectivCRT Diagnostic and the Ventricular Safety Pacing feature (VSP).
Jun 21, 2018Class IIZ-2415-2018Device DesignPotential for a device reset to occur in Percepta CRT-P MRI SureScan and Percepta Quad CRT-P MRI SureScan due to a timing interaction between the EffectivCRT Diagnostic and the Ventricular Safety Pacing feature (VSP).
Jun 21, 2018Class IIZ-2412-2018Device DesignPotential for a device reset to occur in Percepta CRT-P MRI SureScan and Percepta Quad CRT-P MRI SureScan due to a timing interaction between the EffectivCRT Diagnostic and the Ventricular Safety Pacing feature (VSP).
Jun 21, 2018Class IIZ-2413-2018Device DesignPotential for a device reset to occur in Percepta CRT-P MRI SureScan and Percepta Quad CRT-P MRI SureScan due to a timing interaction between the EffectivCRT Diagnostic and the Ventricular Safety Pacing feature (VSP).
Nov 9, 2015Class IIZ-0342-2016Device DesignMedtronic has confirmed an issue with InSync III CRT-pacemaker devices related to long-term battery performance. The root cause is unexpected high battery impedance.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All LWP devices

LWP Implantable Pulse Generator, Pacemaker (Non-Crt): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LWP

46in 2025

2007: 582008: 872009: 782010: 662011: 912012: 1232013: 1162014: 1262015: 972016: 972017: 1162018: 972019: 882020: 902021: 702022: 652023: 542024: 582025: 462026 (partial year): 40
2007high 126 (2014) · low 46 (2025)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LWP

Too few LWP 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · LWP

21in 2025

2007: 72008: 22009: 82010: 72013: 22014: 22015: 22016: 12017: 212024: 4, 4 Class I2025: 21, 21 Class I2026 (partial year): 1, 1 Class I
2007high 21 (2017) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (26 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LWP

11,931in 2025

2007: 492008: 4962009: 8052010: 6782011: 6842012: 1,0872013: 5,1642014: 9,4002015: 9,4222016: 12,3542017: 11,6432018: 14,9362019: 9,6272020: 8,9892021: 9,3742022: 14,2862023: 12,6332024: 10,4952025: 11,931
2007high 14,936 (2018) · low 49 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LWP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200758—749
200887—2496
200978—8805
201066—7678
201191—0684
2012123—01,087
2013116—25,164
2014126—29,400
201597—29,422
201697—112,354
2017116—2111,643
201897—014,936
201988—09,627
202090—08,989
202170—09,374
202265—014,286
202354—012,633
202458—4 (4)10,495
202546—21 (21)11,931
202640—1 (1)—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P010015: Medtronic Insync (TM) Biventrical Pacing System.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P010015

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026