510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Approved

Essure System

P020014/S046PMAApproved Nov 15, 2016180-day reviewClass III21 CFR 884.5380

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Bayer Pharma AG · HHS Transcervical Contraceptive Tubal Occlusion Device

Approved on Nov 15, 2016 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 180-day review.

Decided
Nov 15, 2016
Review
180 days
Class
Class III
Product code
HHS
Recalls
None

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

FIG. 1 — Lineage of P020014/S046Source: FDA PMA database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HHS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All HHS devices

HHS Transcervical Contraceptive Tubal Occlusion Device: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · HHS

2in 2018

2007: 22008: 42009: 72010: 22011: 22012: 72013: 12014: 12015: 22016: 52017: 12018: 2
2007high 7 (2009) · low 0 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HHS

Too few HHS 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · HHS

No recall names HHS since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · HHS

749in 2025

2007: 252008: 562009: 1332010: 1262011: 1132012: 1532013: 8002014: 2,2372015: 5,9562016: 4,9282017: 11,8472018: 5,9832019: 15,0852020: 16,1352021: 3,7252022: 1,6402023: 3,6372024: 8482025: 749
2007high 16,135 (2020) · low 25 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HHS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20072—025
20084—056
20097—0133
20102—0126
20112—0113
20127—0153
20131—0800
20141—02,237
20152—05,956
20165—04,928
20171—011,847
20182—05,983
20190—015,085
20200—016,135
20210—03,725
20220—01,640
20230—03,637
20240—0848
20250—0749
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P020014/S046: Essure System.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P020014/S046

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026