510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class II · 2026

Visian Icl (Implantable Collamer Lens)

P030016PMAApproved Dec 22, 2005959-day reviewClass IIIRecalls 8

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

STAAR Surgical Company · MTA Lens, Intraocular, Phakic

Approved on Dec 22, 2005 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 959-day review. It has been recalled 8 times.

Decided
Dec 22, 2005
Review
959 days
Class
Class III
Product code
MTA
Recalls
8

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P030016 has 45 supplements since 2008: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2008: 72009: 32010: 42011: 32012: 12013: 12014: 22015: 22017: 52018: 12019: 52020: 12021: 12022: 32024: 22025: 32026: 1
2008high 7 (2008) · low 0 (2016)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20087
20093
20104
20113
20121
20131
20142
20152
20175
20181
20195
20201
20211
20223
20242
20253
20261
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P030016, 2008–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MTA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jan 21, 2026Class IIZ-1480-2026Process controlToric Implantable Collamer for correction/reduction of myopia in phakic eyes with astigmatism were labeled as 12.1 mm length but are 12.6 mm length lenses, so there is the potential for excessive vault, which may cause: Significant…
Sep 29, 2023Class IIZ-0464-2024Software design (manufacturing process)Their is a potential that intraocular implant devices may not meet specifications.
Sep 29, 2023Class IIZ-0465-2024Software design (manufacturing process)Their is a potential that intraocular implant devices may not meet specifications.
Sep 29, 2023Class IIZ-0466-2024Software design (manufacturing process)Their is a potential that intraocular implant devices may not meet specifications.
Sep 29, 2023Class IIZ-0467-2024Software design (manufacturing process)Their is a potential that intraocular implant devices may not meet specifications.
Sep 29, 2023Class IIZ-0469-2024Software design (manufacturing process)Their is a potential that intraocular implant devices may not meet specifications.
Sep 29, 2023Class IIZ-0474-2024Software design (manufacturing process)Their is a potential that intraocular implant devices may not meet specifications.
Sep 29, 2023Class IIZ-0468-2024Software design (manufacturing process)Their is a potential that intraocular implant devices may not meet specifications.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All MTA devices

MTA Lens, Intraocular, Phakic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MTA

2in 2025

2008: 72009: 32010: 52011: 42012: 22013: 12014: 22015: 22017: 52018: 32019: 62020: 12021: 12022: 42024: 42025: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 7 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MTA

Too few MTA 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · MTA

7in 2023

2023: 72026 (partial year): 1
2007high 7 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MTA

655in 2025

2007: 42008: 2262009: 6012010: 5512011: 3112012: 5002013: 6962014: 7812015: 1,2792016: 1,4562017: 1,7962018: 1,7782019: 1,2362020: 1,4402021: 2,0632022: 1,9172023: 2,0762024: 2,1482025: 655
2007high 2,148 (2024) · low 4 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MTA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—04
20087—0226
20093—0601
20105—0551
20114—0311
20122—0500
20131—0696
20142—0781
20152—01,279
20160—01,456
20175—01,796
20183—01,778
20196—01,236
20201—01,440
20211—02,063
20224—01,917
20230—72,076
20244—02,148
20252—0655
20262—1—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P030016: Visian Icl (Implantable Collamer Lens).” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P030016

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026