510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class I · 2026

Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) System

P030017PMAApproved Apr 27, 2004349-day reviewClass IIIRecalls 17 (1 Class I)

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Boston Scientific Corp · LGW Stimulator, Spinal-Cord, Totally Implanted For Pain Relief

Approved on Apr 27, 2004 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 349-day review. It has a Class I recall. It has been recalled 17 times, including a Class I recall.

Decided
Apr 27, 2004
Review
349 days
Class
Class III
Product code
LGW
Recalls
17 (1 Class I)

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P030017 has 373 supplements since 2004: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2004: 22005: 72006: 42007: 112008: 312009: 132010: 252011: 112012: 232013: 332014: 252015: 332016: 262017: 372018: 172019: 102020: 112021: 72022: 42023: 122024: 122025: 82026: 11
2004high 37 (2017) · low 2 (2004)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20042
20057
20064
200711
200831
200913
201025
201111
201223
201333
201425
201533
201626
201737
201817
201910
202011
20217
20224
202312
202412
20258
202611
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P030017, 2004–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jun 17, 2026Class IZ-2879-2026Device DesignSpinal cord stimulation system lead body may be exposed to stress at the anchor site. This may result in high impedance measurements or lead fractures, which may lead to inadequate stimulation, additional intervention, including lead…
Apr 29, 2026Class IIZ-2404-2026Packaging process controlSterile anchors my lack sterility assurance.
Jul 17, 2024Class IIZ-2617-2024Software designSpinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG) may experience routine system check during IPG charging, which may cause device reset, which may lead to transient loss of stimulation; patients may experience undesired…
Apr 24, 2019Class IIZ-2121-2020Labeling Change ControlThe firm is initiating a voluntary removal of certain spinal cord stimulation leads, lead extensions, adapters, and deep brain stimulation lead extensions due to the "use by date" displayed on the label which is later than the correct…
Apr 24, 2019Class IIZ-2120-2020Labeling Change ControlThe firm is initiating a voluntary removal of certain spinal cord stimulation leads, lead extensions, adapters, and deep brain stimulation lead extensions due to the "use by date" displayed on the label which is later than the correct…
Apr 24, 2019Class IIZ-2124-2020Labeling Change ControlThe firm is initiating a voluntary removal of certain spinal cord stimulation leads, lead extensions, adapters, and deep brain stimulation lead extensions due to the "use by date" displayed on the label which is later than the correct…
Apr 24, 2019Class IIZ-2119-2020Labeling Change ControlThe firm is initiating a voluntary removal of certain spinal cord stimulation leads, lead extensions, adapters, and deep brain stimulation lead extensions due to the "use by date" displayed on the label which is later than the correct…
Apr 24, 2019Class IIZ-2122-2020Labeling Change ControlThe firm is initiating a voluntary removal of certain spinal cord stimulation leads, lead extensions, adapters, and deep brain stimulation lead extensions due to the "use by date" displayed on the label which is later than the correct…
Apr 24, 2019Class IIZ-2123-2020Labeling Change ControlThe firm is initiating a voluntary removal of certain spinal cord stimulation leads, lead extensions, adapters, and deep brain stimulation lead extensions due to "use by date" displayed on the label which is later than the correct "use by…
Mar 19, 2010Not classifiedZ-1409-2010OtherToshiba has determined that certain Sony battery packs installed in Toshiba portable computers can overheat, posing fire hazard to customers. Based on Toshiba's investigation with Sony Corporation, they concluded that the battery cells in…
Sep 22, 2008Not classifiedZ-0271-2009OtherSince April 2004, 27 of 8,769 (0.31%) patients have reported receiving second degree burns in the area of charging and 3 of 8,769 (0.03%) patients have reported receiving third degree burns in the area of charging while using Charger 1…
Apr 22, 2008Not classifiedZ-1441-2012Labeling mix-upsThe recall was initiated because there is a possibility that the OMG Connector-A is incorrectly packaged with an OMG Connector-M Instruction manual.
Oct 5, 2007Not classifiedZ-0960-2008Device DesignIncorrect Data -- Corruption of internal memory component results in an inability for the physician to reprogram the IPG with firmware version prior to Revision 3.02. When this occurs, the IPG will report an error code of "10h0" or "00h0"…
Aug 3, 2007Not classifiedZ-0055-2008Error in labelingMislabeled: Product labeled with the incorrect shelf-life information.
Jan 30, 2007Not classifiedZ-0700-2007OtherThe Precision Implantable Pulse Generator with firmware Revision 3.01 incorrectly reports an error condition for a valid output from its self internal check.
Sep 21, 2006Not classifiedZ-0299-2007OtherA small number of unimplanted Precision Linear Leads may have been assembled with incorrect electrode material. At high stimulation levels, the metal may corrode and dissolved metals may enter the patient.
Nov 11, 2004Not classifiedZ-0396-05OtherA burn injury was sustained by a patient that did not follow the directions for use and also slept while charging the unit.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All LGW devices

LGW Stimulator, Spinal-Cord, Totally Implanted For Pain Relief: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LGW

65in 2025

2007: 202008: 532009: 382010: 562011: 472012: 682013: 712014: 682015: 722016: 922017: 942018: 642019: 692020: 522021: 562022: 602023: 632024: 942025: 652026 (partial year): 56
2007high 94 (2017) · low 20 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LGW

Too few LGW 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · LGW

3in 2025

2007: 42008: 42009: 22010: 22011: 12012: 12013: 32016: 22017: 22020: 12021: 12022: 52023: 22024: 22025: 32026 (partial year): 2, 1 Class I
2007high 5 (2022) · low 0 (2014)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LGW

31,054in 2025

2007: 1,0942008: 3,0182009: 5,2512010: 9,2652011: 11,1322012: 17,9152013: 22,4322014: 11,2502015: 11,6902016: 15,6432017: 18,6122018: 23,6262019: 30,0382020: 28,1062021: 24,3332022: 23,2692023: 33,5282024: 35,0742025: 31,054
2007high 35,074 (2024) · low 1,094 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LGW, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200720—41,094
200853—43,018
200938—25,251
201056—29,265
201147—111,132
201268—117,915
201371—322,432
201468—011,250
201572—011,690
201692—215,643
201794—218,612
201864—023,626
201969—030,038
202052—128,106
202156—124,333
202260—523,269
202363—233,528
202494—235,074
202565—331,054
202656—2 (1)—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P030017: Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) System.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P030017

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026