510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class II · 2013

Trilogy AB Acetabular System

P040048PMAApproved Jun 28, 2006561-day reviewClass IIIRecalls 4

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Zimmer, Inc. · MRA Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Ceramic/Metal, Cemented Or Uncemented

Approved on Jun 28, 2006 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 561-day review. It has been recalled 4 times.

Decided
Jun 28, 2006
Review
561 days
Class
Class III
Product code
MRA
Recalls
4

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P040048 has 14 supplements since 2006: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2006: 12007: 12008: 32009: 32010: 22011: 22012: 2
2006high 3 (2008) · low 1 (2006)2012
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20061
20071
20083
20093
20102
20112
20122
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P040048, 2006–2012Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MRA? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 11, 2013Class IIZ-1028-2014PackagingZimmer recently conducted a review of all historic packaging validations at its Zimmer Manufacturing B.V. (ZMBV) facility in Ponce, Puerto Rico. Based on this review, it was determined that the packaging operations conducted in the…
Sep 14, 2012Class IIZ-0774-2013Process controlSome units of Trilogy shells manufactured since March 2009 may be below the lower range of the pore size specification (as low as 28% vs. 30% porosity specification). On 10/31/2012, the firm expanded the recall action to include lots of…
Sep 14, 2012Class IIZ-0776-2013Process controlSome units of Trilogy shells manufactured since March 2009 may be below the lower range of the pore size specification (as low as 28% vs. 30% porosity specification). On 10/31/2012, the firm expanded the recall action to include lots of…
May 29, 2009Not classifiedZ-1616-2009Packaging process controlThe corner tab of the inner compartment lid was not folded under before the outer lid was sealed, resulting in lack of assurance of sterility.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All MRA devices

MRA Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Ceramic/Metal, Cemented Or Uncemented: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MRA

18in 2025

2007: 102008: 122009: 142010: 142011: 122012: 282013: 172014: 92015: 182016: 262017: 162018: 112019: 172020: 132021: 182022: 332023: 192024: 162025: 182026 (partial year): 7
2007high 33 (2022) · low 9 (2014)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MRA

Too few MRA 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · MRA

1in 2013

2008: 52009: 12011: 62012: 22013: 1
2007high 6 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MRA

88in 2025

2007: 1172008: 1462009: 912010: 1882011: 2482012: 2832013: 2352014: 2812015: 3302016: 3672017: 5402018: 6962019: 6412020: 3712021: 1092022: 892023: 1322024: 1182025: 88
2007high 696 (2018) · low 88 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MRA, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200710—0117
200812—5146
200914—191
201014—0188
201112—6248
201228—2283
201317—1235
20149—0281
201518—0330
201626—0367
201716—0540
201811—0696
201917—0641
202013—0371
202118—0109
202233—089
202319—0132
202416—0118
202518—088
20267—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P040048: Trilogy AB Acetabular System.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P040048

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026