510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class II · 2017

Ovatio CRT System

P060027PMAApproved May 15, 2008591-day reviewClass IIIRecalls 3

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

MicroPort CRM USA, Inc. · NIK Defibrillator, Automatic Implantable Cardioverter, With Cardiac Resynchronization (Crt-D)

Approved on May 15, 2008 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 591-day review. It has been recalled 3 times.

Decided
May 15, 2008
Review
591 days
Class
Class III
Product code
NIK
Recalls
3

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P060027 has 104 supplements since 2008: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2008: 52009: 102010: 122011: 52012: 102013: 112014: 152015: 72016: 92017: 42018: 62019: 32020: 42021: 12025: 2
2008high 15 (2014) · low 0 (2022)2025
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20085
200910
201012
20115
201210
201311
201415
20157
20169
20174
20186
20193
20204
20211
20252
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P060027, 2008–2025Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NIK? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jul 24, 2017Class IIZ-3230-2017Software designThere is a possibility of overconsumption of certain PLATINIUM Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICDs) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillators (CRT-Ds) following an ElectroStatic Discharge (ESD) during the implant surgery…
Jul 24, 2017Class IIZ-3233-2017Software designThere is a possibility of overconsumption of certain PLATINIUM Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICDs) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillators (CRT-Ds) following an ElectroStatic Discharge (ESD) during the implant surgery…
Jun 7, 2010Not classifiedZ-2579-2010Software designThe Paradym CRT 8750 and CRT sonR 8770 device models have a software anomaly, which will cause the device to lose the ability to sense/pace and to deliver further therapy. The software anomaly could only occurs under a specific sequence…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All NIK devices

NIK Defibrillator, Automatic Implantable Cardioverter, With Cardiac Resynchronization (Crt-D): FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2008, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NIK

56in 2025

2007: 532008: 622009: 432010: 512011: 502012: 832013: 502014: 762015: 492016: 1092017: 1122018: 912019: 622020: 752021: 672022: 622023: 582024: 562025: 562026 (partial year): 44
2007high 112 (2017) · low 43 (2009)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NIK

Too few NIK 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · NIK

1in 2022

2007: 92008: 12009: 22010: 72012: 22016: 2, 1 Class I2017: 9, 5 Class I2020: 32022: 1
2007high 9 (2007) · low 0 (2011)2026

Class I (6 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NIK

10,855in 2025

2007: 9242008: 3,0212009: 4,1772010: 5,6682011: 5,9442012: 5,5822013: 7,3732014: 10,7312015: 7,8282016: 13,2552017: 16,2652018: 8,3482019: 7,2662020: 9,6092021: 10,1342022: 10,6462023: 11,8972024: 11,6972025: 10,855
2007high 16,265 (2017) · low 924 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NIK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200753—9924
200862—13,021
200943—24,177
201051—75,668
201150—05,944
201283—25,582
201350—07,373
201476—010,731
201549—07,828
2016109—2 (1)13,255
2017112—9 (5)16,265
201891—08,348
201962—07,266
202075—39,609
202167—010,134
202262—110,646
202358—011,897
202456—011,697
202556—010,855
202644—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P060027: Ovatio CRT System.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P060027

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026