510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class II · 2019

Nexgen LPS-Flex Mobile and LPS-Mobile Bearing Knee System

P060037PMAApproved Dec 10, 2007357-day reviewClass IIIRecalls 15

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Zimmer, Inc. · NJL Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Mobile Bearing

Approved on Dec 10, 2007 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 357-day review. It has been recalled 15 times.

Decided
Dec 10, 2007
Review
357 days
Class
Class III
Product code
NJL
Recalls
15

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P060037 has 98 supplements since 2008: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2008: 32009: 62010: 22011: 32012: 32013: 42014: 82015: 112016: 52017: 62018: 42019: 52020: 82021: 52022: 72023: 42024: 62025: 32026: 5
2008high 11 (2015) · low 2 (2010)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20083
20096
20102
20113
20123
20134
20148
201511
20165
20176
20184
20195
20208
20215
20227
20234
20246
20253
20265
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P060037, 2008–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NJL? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 10, 2019Class IIZ-0324-2020Packaging change controlNon-highly polished implants may adhere to the LDPE bag (previous packaging configuration).
Nov 29, 2017Class IIZ-1035-2018PackagingThe LDPE bag packaging for various highly polished hip and knee implants may adhere to the highly polished surface, leaving residue or material from the LDPE bag on the implant after it is removed from the bag.
Nov 29, 2017Class IIZ-1036-2018PackagingThe LDPE bag packaging for various highly polished hip and knee implants may adhere to the highly polished surface, leaving residue or material from the LDPE bag on the implant after it is removed from the bag.
Nov 29, 2017Class IIZ-1043-2018PackagingThe LDPE bag packaging for various highly polished hip and knee implants may adhere to the highly polished surface, leaving residue or material from the LDPE bag on the implant after it is removed from the bag.
Nov 29, 2017Class IIZ-1044-2018PackagingThe LDPE bag packaging for various highly polished hip and knee implants may adhere to the highly polished surface, leaving residue or material from the LDPE bag on the implant after it is removed from the bag.
Nov 29, 2017Class IIZ-1045-2018PackagingThe LDPE bag packaging for various highly polished hip and knee implants may adhere to the highly polished surface, leaving residue or material from the LDPE bag on the implant after it is removed from the bag.
Nov 29, 2017Class IIZ-1038-2018PackagingThe LDPE bag packaging for various highly polished hip and knee implants may adhere to the highly polished surface, leaving residue or material from the LDPE bag on the implant after it is removed from the bag.
Nov 29, 2017Class IIZ-1040-2018PackagingThe LDPE bag packaging for various highly polished hip and knee implants may adhere to the highly polished surface, leaving residue or material from the LDPE bag on the implant after it is removed from the bag.
Jul 24, 2017Class IIZ-0663-2018Reprocessing ControlsThere is a possibility that the protective foam insert used during the packaging of the affected products is undersized, which may cause a breach in the inner cavity during transportation.
Jan 11, 2016Class IIZ-0841-2016Process controlLDPE bag containing the implant adheres to the highly polished implant surface.
Aug 30, 2013Class IIZ-0080-2014Package design/selectionThe low density polyethylene (LDPE) bag used to package implants adheres to the highly polished surface of the devices.
Apr 17, 2009Not classifiedZ-1522-2009Employee errorThe implant surface may not have been polished adequately, which could result in increased wear and polyethylene debris generation.
Apr 17, 2009Not classifiedZ-1520-2009Employee errorThe implant surface may not have been polished adequately, which could result in increased wear and polyethylene debris generation.
Apr 17, 2009Not classifiedZ-1521-2009Employee errorThe implant surface may not have been polished adequately, which could result in increased wear and polyethylene debris generation.
Apr 17, 2009Not classifiedZ-1523-2009Employee errorThe implant surface may not have been polished adequately, which could result in increased wear and polyethylene debris generation.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All NJL devices

NJL Prosthesis, Knee, Patellofemorotibial, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Mobile Bearing: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2007, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NJL

23in 2025

2007: 42008: 62009: 122010: 42011: 82012: 112013: 152014: 212015: 232016: 172017: 212018: 272019: 302020: 282021: 182022: 302023: 172024: 232025: 232026 (partial year): 28
2007high 30 (2019) · low 4 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NJL

Too few NJL 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · NJL

1in 2019

2007: 492008: 12009: 42013: 12016: 32017: 92019: 1
2007high 49 (2007) · low 0 (2010)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NJL

1,088in 2025

2007: 3692008: 6902009: 8082010: 1,0082011: 1,1022012: 1,3092013: 1,2982014: 1,3012015: 1,0682016: 1,3872017: 1,1422018: 1,2652019: 1,9682020: 1,8642021: 2,6442022: 2,3192023: 1,5932024: 1,2362025: 1,088
2007high 2,644 (2021) · low 369 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NJL, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20074—49369
20086—1690
200912—4808
20104—01,008
20118—01,102
201211—01,309
201315—11,298
201421—01,301
201523—01,068
201617—31,387
201721—91,142
201827—01,265
201930—11,968
202028—01,864
202118—02,644
202230—02,319
202317—01,593
202423—01,236
202523—01,088
202628—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P060037: Nexgen LPS-Flex Mobile and LPS-Mobile Bearing Knee System.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P060037

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026