510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Approved

Sientra Silicone Gel Breast Implants

P070004PMAApproved Mar 9, 20121,873-day reviewClass III21 CFR 878.3540

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Tiger Aesthetics Medical, LLC · FTR Prosthesis, Breast, Noninflatable, Internal, Silicone Gel-Filled

Approved on Mar 9, 2012 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 1,873-day review.

Decided
Mar 9, 2012
Review
1,873 days
Class
Class III
Product code
FTR
Recalls
None

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P070004 has 42 supplements since 2012: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2012: 42013: 12014: 12016: 12017: 22018: 42019: 92020: 12021: 22022: 42023: 52024: 52025: 22026: 1
2012high 9 (2019) · low 0 (2015)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20124
20131
20141
20161
20172
20184
20199
20201
20212
20224
20235
20245
20252
20261
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P070004, 2012–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in FTR? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All FTR devices

FTR Prosthesis, Breast, Noninflatable, Internal, Silicone Gel-Filled: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2012, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · FTR

16in 2025

2007: 52008: 72009: 42010: 22011: 22012: 72013: 122014: 192015: 282016: 202017: 332018: 112019: 142020: 102021: 212022: 82023: 102024: 202025: 162026 (partial year): 15
2007high 33 (2017) · low 2 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · FTR

Too few FTR 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · FTR

2in 2019

2019: 2
2007high 2 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · FTR

30,958in 2025

2007: 942008: 1062009: 532010: 592011: 1012012: 1022013: 1202014: 1402015: 2042016: 2902017: 9302018: 2,6442019: 21,4112020: 24,2982021: 23,3652022: 30,8172023: 29,0982024: 30,2872025: 30,958
2007high 30,958 (2025) · low 53 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code FTR, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20075—094
20087—0106
20094—053
20102—059
20112—0101
20127—0102
201312—0120
201419—0140
201528—0204
201620—0290
201733—0930
201811—02,644
201914—221,411
202010—024,298
202121—023,365
20228—030,817
202310—029,098
202420—030,287
202516—030,958
202615—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P070004: Sientra Silicone Gel Breast Implants.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P070004

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026