510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class II · 2012

Cordis Exoseal Vascular Closure Device

P100013PMAApproved May 19, 2011413-day reviewClass IIIRecalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Cordis US Corporation · MGB Device, Hemostasis, Vascular

Approved on May 19, 2011 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 413-day review. It has been recalled once.

Decided
May 19, 2011
Review
413 days
Class
Class III
Product code
MGB
Recalls
1

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P100013 has 32 supplements since 2011: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2011: 22012: 62013: 12014: 12015: 12016: 12017: 22018: 12019: 32021: 32022: 22023: 32025: 32026: 3
2011high 6 (2012) · low 0 (2020)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20112
20126
20131
20141
20151
20161
20172
20181
20193
20213
20222
20233
20253
20263
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P100013, 2011–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MGB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 29, 2012Class IIZ-0740-2013Material/Component ContaminationAffected lots of Cordis ExoSeal (TM) VCD have been sterilized using a process that did not achieve the sterility assurance level that is required by the standards of this class of product. Model Numbers EX500, EX600, and EX700.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All MGB devices

MGB Device, Hemostasis, Vascular: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2011, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MGB

18in 2025

2007: 182008: 202009: 342010: 222011: 232012: 162013: 122014: 262015: 282016: 262017: 152018: 232019: 272020: 102021: 172022: 112023: 182024: 222025: 182026 (partial year): 24
2007high 34 (2009) · low 10 (2020)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MGB

Too few MGB 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · MGB

2in 2023

2009: 12012: 12023: 2
2007high 2 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MGB

12,664in 2025

2007: 1,5882008: 2,2672009: 2,4362010: 3,9332011: 4,0112012: 3,7862013: 3,0112014: 4,4682015: 3,9442016: 4,3302017: 5,3462018: 5,6792019: 6,1562020: 5,9272021: 7,5862022: 9,4572023: 13,5292024: 13,7622025: 12,664
2007high 13,762 (2024) · low 1,588 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MGB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200718—01,588
200820—02,267
200934—12,436
201022—03,933
201123—04,011
201216—13,786
201312—03,011
201426—04,468
201528—03,944
201626—04,330
201715—05,346
201823—05,679
201927—06,156
202010—05,927
202117—07,586
202211—09,457
202318—213,529
202422—013,762
202518—012,664
202624—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P100013: Cordis Exoseal Vascular Closure Device.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P100013

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026