510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Approved

Model 5071 Lead

P120017PMAApproved Apr 27, 2015935-day reviewClass III21 CFR 870.3680

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medtronic, Inc. · DTB Permanent Pacemaker Electrode

Approved on Apr 27, 2015 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 935-day review.

Decided
Apr 27, 2015
Review
935 days
Class
Class III
Product code
DTB
Recalls
None

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P120017 has 40 supplements since 2015: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2015: 12016: 62017: 42018: 52019: 42020: 62021: 32022: 22023: 42024: 22025: 12026: 2
2015high 6 (2016) · low 1 (2015)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20151
20166
20174
20185
20194
20206
20213
20222
20234
20242
20251
20262
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P120017, 2015–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in DTB? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All DTB devices

DTB Permanent Pacemaker Electrode: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · DTB

1in 2025

2015: 32016: 82017: 52018: 62019: 72020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 72024: 32025: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 8 (2016) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DTB

Too few DTB 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · DTB

1in 2015

2008: 12009: 22010: 22015: 1
2007high 2 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DTB

25,591in 2025

2007: 5,4012008: 6,4692009: 7,5652010: 14,2852011: 12,5552012: 12,2302013: 10,1022014: 13,3242015: 11,0712016: 11,8392017: 11,4952018: 15,2092019: 16,8122020: 17,8592021: 18,4422022: 19,4442023: 34,5422024: 25,6892025: 25,591
2007high 34,542 (2023) · low 5,401 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DTB, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—05,401
20080—16,469
20090—27,565
20100—214,285
20110—012,555
20120—012,230
20130—010,102
20140—013,324
20153—111,071
20168—011,839
20175—011,495
20186—015,209
20197—016,812
20206—017,859
20213—018,442
20224—019,444
20237—034,542
20243—025,689
20251—025,591
20262—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P120017: Model 5071 Lead.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P120017

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026