510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class II · 2025

Brio Neurostimulation System

P140009PMAApproved Jun 12, 2015403-day reviewClass IIIRecalls 5

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Abbott Medical · MHY Stimulator, Electrical, Implanted, For Parkinsonian Tremor

Approved on Jun 12, 2015 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 403-day review. It has been recalled 5 times.

Decided
Jun 12, 2015
Review
403 days
Class
Class III
Product code
MHY
Recalls
5

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P140009 has 135 supplements since 2015: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2015: 72016: 122017: 102018: 102019: 92020: 112021: 132022: 62023: 82024: 232025: 152026: 11
2015high 23 (2024) · low 6 (2022)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20157
201612
201710
201810
20199
202011
202113
20226
20238
202423
202515
202611
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P140009, 2015–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MHY? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 6, 2025Class IIZ-0459-2026Process controlThere is a potential issue affecting Eterna Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Implantable Pulse Generators (IPGs), Model 32400 and Liberta RC Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Implantable Pulse Generators (IPGs), Model 62400 . These devicess may…
Jun 2, 2017Class IIZ-2694-2017Device DesignThe firm discovered a risk of loss of Neuromodulation therapy due to exposure of the IPG to monopolar electrosurgical devices (ESU) during medical procedures.
Jun 2, 2017Class IIZ-2696-2017Device DesignThe firm discovered a risk of loss of Neuromodulation therapy due to exposure of the IPG to monopolar electrosurgical devices (ESU) during medical procedures.
Jun 2, 2017Class IIZ-2695-2017Device DesignThe firm discovered a risk of loss of Neuromodulation therapy due to exposure of the IPG to monopolar electrosurgical devices (ESU) during medical procedures.
Jun 2, 2017Class IIZ-2693-2017Device DesignThe firm discovered a risk of loss of Neuromodulation therapy due to exposure of the IPG to monopolar electrosurgical devices (ESU) during medical procedures.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All MHY devices

MHY Stimulator, Electrical, Implanted, For Parkinsonian Tremor: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2015, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MHY

44in 2025

2007: 32008: 72009: 182010: 282011: 312012: 252013: 232014: 252015: 182016: 372017: 452018: 362019: 422020: 372021: 362022: 342023: 312024: 472025: 442026 (partial year): 29
2007high 47 (2024) · low 3 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MHY

Too few MHY 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · MHY

1in 2025

2007: 32008: 42012: 22013: 12016: 12017: 12018: 12020: 12021: 32022: 12023: 12024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 4 (2008) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MHY

3,373in 2025

2007: 7102008: 1,4502009: 1,3142010: 1,5322011: 1,5972012: 2,3822013: 2,8452014: 2,6212015: 3,0882016: 3,5592017: 3,5612018: 4,4942019: 2,8172020: 2,6732021: 2,4272022: 2,2572023: 3,4892024: 4,3862025: 3,373
2007high 4,494 (2018) · low 710 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MHY, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20073—3710
20087—41,450
200918—01,314
201028—01,532
201131—01,597
201225—22,382
201323—12,845
201425—02,621
201518—03,088
201637—13,559
201745—13,561
201836—14,494
201942—02,817
202037—12,673
202136—32,427
202234—12,257
202331—13,489
202447—14,386
202544—13,373
202629—2—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P140009: Brio Neurostimulation System.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P140009

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026