510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class II · 2018

Visumax Femtosecond Laser

P150040PMAApproved Sep 13, 2016319-day reviewClass IIIRecalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. · OTL Femtosecond Laser System For Refractive Correction

Approved on Sep 13, 2016 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 319-day review. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Sep 13, 2016
Review
319 days
Class
Class III
Product code
OTL
Recalls
1

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P150040 has 23 supplements since 2017: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2017: 12018: 22019: 12020: 32021: 22022: 22023: 22024: 52025: 32026: 2
2017high 5 (2024) · low 1 (2017)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20171
20182
20191
20203
20212
20222
20232
20245
20253
20262
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P150040, 2017–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OTL? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 6, 2018Class IIZ-0680-2020Software designVisuMax devices with software version 2.10.13 and activated SW-Module ReLEx (SMILE) option may experience a software issue. In case of a suction loss during treatment the software allows the user to choose the option immediate restart or…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All OTL devices

OTL Femtosecond Laser System For Refractive Correction: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2016, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OTL

3in 2025

2016: 12017: 12018: 22019: 12020: 32021: 22022: 22023: 22024: 52025: 32026 (partial year): 2
2007high 5 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OTL

Too few OTL 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · OTL

1in 2018

2018: 1
2007high 1 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OTL

9in 2025

2017: 62018: 82019: 42020: 72021: 62022: 32023: 132024: 112025: 9
2007high 13 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OTL, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20161—00
20171—06
20182—18
20191—04
20203—07
20212—06
20222—03
20232—013
20245—011
20253—09
20262—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P150040: Visumax Femtosecond Laser.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P150040

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026