510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class II · 2026

Hintermann Series H3 Total Ankle Replacement System

P160036PMAApproved Jun 4, 20191,014-day reviewClass IIIRecalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Dt Medtech, LLC · NTG Prosthesis, Ankle, Uncemented, Non-Constrained

Approved on Jun 4, 2019 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 1,014-day review. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Jun 4, 2019
Review
1,014 days
Class
Class III
Product code
NTG
Recalls
1

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P160036 has 6 supplements since 2019: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2019: 12021: 22023: 12024: 12026: 1
2019high 2 (2021) · low 0 (2020)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20191
20212
20231
20241
20261
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P160036, 2019–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NTG? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 24, 2026Class IIZ-2399-2026Labeling Change ControlThrough customer complaints, the ankle replacement system was found to contain incorrect devices: Left implant packaging and labeling bears a right implant device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All NTG devices

NTG Prosthesis, Ankle, Uncemented, Non-Constrained: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2019, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NTG

2in 2024

2009: 12010: 22013: 22014: 22016: 22018: 12019: 32020: 22021: 72022: 42023: 22024: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 7 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NTG

Too few NTG 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · NTG

1in 2023

2018: 22023: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 2 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NTG

14in 2025

2009: 22010: 192011: 152012: 192013: 302014: 922015: 3412016: 862017: 822018: 932019: 1292020: 5452021: 892022: 502023: 122024: 222025: 14
2007high 545 (2020) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NTG, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20091—02
20102—019
20110—015
20120—019
20132—030
20142—092
20150—0341
20162—086
20170—082
20181—293
20193—0129
20202—0545
20217—089
20224—050
20232—112
20242—022
20250—014
20261—1—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P160036: Hintermann Series H3 Total Ankle Replacement System.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P160036

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026