510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class II · 2022

Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Aneurysm Embolization System

P170032PMAApproved Dec 31, 2018459-day reviewClass IIIRecalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

MicroVention, Inc. · OPR Intrasaccular Flow Disruption Device

Approved on Dec 31, 2018 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 459-day review. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Dec 31, 2018
Review
459 days
Class
Class III
Product code
OPR
Recalls
1

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P170032 has 20 supplements since 2019: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2019: 12020: 32021: 62022: 12023: 32024: 32026: 3
2019high 6 (2021) · low 0 (2025)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20191
20203
20216
20221
20233
20243
20263
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P170032, 2019–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in OPR? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Sep 21, 2022Class IIZ-0170-2023Process controlDetachment controller, of an aneurysm embolization system, has an out of specification tunnel opening dimension, which may prevent the implant device pusher from being fully inserted into the controller, which may result in the inability…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All OPR devices

OPR Intrasaccular Flow Disruption Device: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2018, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · OPR

3in 2024

2018: 12019: 12020: 32021: 62022: 12023: 32024: 32026 (partial year): 3
2007high 6 (2021) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · OPR

Too few OPR 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · OPR

1in 2022

2022: 1
2007high 1 (2022) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · OPR

218in 2025

2019: 212020: 112021: 592022: 622023: 1192024: 2622025: 218
2007high 262 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code OPR, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20181—00
20191—021
20203—011
20216—059
20221—162
20233—0119
20243—0262
20250—0218
20263—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P170032: Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Aneurysm Embolization System.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P170032

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026