510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class II · 2024

Portico Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation System

P190023PMAApproved Sep 17, 2021739-day reviewClass IIIRecalls 5

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Abbott Medical · NPT Aortic Valve, Prosthesis, Percutaneously Delivered

Approved on Sep 17, 2021 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 739-day review. It has been recalled 5 times.

Decided
Sep 17, 2021
Review
739 days
Class
Class III
Product code
NPT
Recalls
5

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P190023 has 32 supplements since 2021: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2021: 32022: 72023: 72024: 52025: 52026: 5
2021high 7 (2022) · low 3 (2021)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20213
20227
20237
20245
20255
20265
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P190023, 2021–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in NPT? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 17, 2024Class IIZ-0491-2025Under Investigation by firmA manufacturing error resulting in acceptance of valves with a leaflet deflection value that was outside of established specifications. This could potentially affect long-term durability of the impacted valve and/or cause potential valve…
Oct 17, 2024Class IIZ-0494-2025Under Investigation by firmA manufacturing error resulting in acceptance of valves with a leaflet deflection value that was outside of established specifications. This could potentially affect long-term durability of the impacted valve and/or cause potential valve…
Oct 17, 2024Class IIZ-0495-2025Under Investigation by firmA manufacturing error resulting in acceptance of valves with a leaflet deflection value that was outside of established specifications. This could potentially affect long-term durability of the impacted valve and/or cause potential valve…
Oct 17, 2024Class IIZ-0492-2025Under Investigation by firmA manufacturing error resulting in acceptance of valves with a leaflet deflection value that was outside of established specifications. This could potentially affect long-term durability of the impacted valve and/or cause potential valve…
Oct 17, 2024Class IIZ-0493-2025Under Investigation by firmA manufacturing error resulting in acceptance of valves with a leaflet deflection value that was outside of established specifications. This could potentially affect long-term durability of the impacted valve and/or cause potential valve…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All NPT devices

NPT Aortic Valve, Prosthesis, Percutaneously Delivered: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2021, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · NPT

29in 2025

2011: 12012: 202013: 482014: 562015: 432016: 612017: 652018: 432019: 592020: 482021: 422022: 412023: 492024: 332025: 292026 (partial year): 34
2007high 65 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NPT

Too few NPT 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · NPT

5in 2024

2014: 4, 3 Class I2017: 1, 1 Class I2019: 12020: 9, 6 Class I2024: 52026 (partial year): 3
2007high 9 (2020) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (10 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NPT

12,906in 2025

2012: 982013: 1,0962014: 2,1612015: 2,8622016: 2,9962017: 3,1152018: 3,9162019: 4,3612020: 5,8062021: 5,6042022: 5,9942023: 8,3192024: 11,0432025: 12,906
2007high 12,906 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NPT, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20111—00
201220—098
201348—01,096
201456—4 (3)2,161
201543—02,862
201661—02,996
201765—1 (1)3,115
201843—03,916
201959—14,361
202048—9 (6)5,806
202142—05,604
202241—05,994
202349—08,319
202433—511,043
202529—012,906
202634—3—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P190023: Portico Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation System.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P190023

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026