510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class I · 2025

enVista Envy™ hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL), enVista Envy™ toric hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL)

P240005PMAApproved Oct 10, 2024216-day reviewClass III21 CFR 886.3600Recalls 1 (1 Class I)

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Bausch & Lomb, Inc. · MFK Lens, Multifocal Intraocular

Approved on Oct 10, 2024 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 216-day review. It has a Class I recall. It has been recalled once, including a Class I recall.

Decided
Oct 10, 2024
Review
216 days
Class
Class III
Product code
MFK
Recalls
1 (1 Class I)

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P240005 has 10 supplements since 2024: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2024: 12025: 32026: 6
2024high 6 (2026) · low 1 (2024)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20241
20253
20266
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P240005, 2024–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Mar 27, 2025Class IZ-1680-2025Process controlIn response to an increased number of reports of toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) in conjunction with implantation of enVista Aspire and enVista Envy IOLs, and certain enVista monofocal lenses in the U.S.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All MFK devices

MFK Lens, Multifocal Intraocular: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2024, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · MFK

17so far in 2026, the most since 2007

2007: 132008: 122009: 142010: 92011: 102012: 92013: 92014: 52015: 32016: 112017: 122018: 122019: 82020: 42021: 82022: 82023: 62024: 112025: 142026 (partial year): 17
2007high 17 (2026) · low 3 (2015)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MFK

Too few MFK 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · MFK

No recall names MFK since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · MFK

717in 2025

2007: 352008: 4202009: 5862010: 6012011: 5842012: 3082013: 2962014: 3082015: 7082016: 7312017: 6132018: 6292019: 6832020: 9122021: 1,2052022: 1,2652023: 1,0472024: 8592025: 717
2007high 1,265 (2022) · low 35 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MFK, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200713—035
200812—0420
200914—0586
20109—0601
201110—0584
20129—0308
20139—0296
20145—0308
20153—0708
201611—0731
201712—0613
201812—0629
20198—0683
20204—0912
20218—01,205
20228—01,265
20236—01,047
202411—0859
202514—0717
202617—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P240005: enVista Envy™ hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL), enVista Envy™ toric hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL).” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P240005

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026