510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class II · 2019

Healon, Healon GV, HEALON5 Products Sodium Hyaluronate Ophthalmic Viscoelastic Devices

P810031PMAApproved Jan 14, 1983556-day reviewClass III21 CFR 886.4275Recalls 8

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · LZP Aid, Surgical, Viscoelastic

Approved on Jan 14, 1983 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 556-day review. It has been recalled 8 times.

Decided
Jan 14, 1983
Review
556 days
Class
Class III
Product code
LZP
Recalls
8

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P810031 has 75 supplements since 1983: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

1983: 11984: 41985: 11986: 11987: 11988: 11989: 11991: 11992: 11994: 11995: 21999: 12000: 12002: 12003: 12005: 12006: 52007: 32008: 22010: 22011: 32012: 42013: 52014: 12015: 42016: 42017: 22018: 22019: 12020: 42021: 22022: 12023: 22024: 22025: 52026: 1
1983high 5 (2006) · low 0 (1990)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
19831
19844
19851
19861
19871
19881
19891
19911
19921
19941
19952
19991
20001
20021
20031
20051
20065
20073
20082
20102
20113
20124
20135
20141
20154
20164
20172
20182
20191
20204
20212
20221
20232
20242
20255
20261
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P810031, 1983–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LZP? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 3, 2019Class IIZ-0867-2020Labeling False and MisleadingOphthalmic viscosurgical device may be difficult to remove from the eye, leading to increased postoperative intraocular pressure requiring additional intervention. Also, reports of clogging of phacoemulsion equipment tubing, which may…
Apr 1, 2017Class IIZ-2063-2017Process designRemote possibility that certain solutions in these lots may contain microscopic glass particles due to damage that occurred at the cylinder neck during the manufacturing process.
Apr 1, 2017Class IIZ-2064-2017Process designRemote possibility that certain solutions in these lots may contain microscopic glass particles due to damage that occurred at the cylinder neck during the manufacturing process.
Apr 1, 2017Class IIZ-2067-2017Process designRemote possibility that certain solutions in these lots may contain microscopic glass particles due to damage that occurred at the cylinder neck during the manufacturing process.
Apr 1, 2017Class IIZ-2062-2017Process designRemote possibility that certain solutions in these lots may contain microscopic glass particles due to damage that occurred at the cylinder neck during the manufacturing process.
Apr 1, 2017Class IIZ-2065-2017Process designRemote possibility that certain solutions in these lots may contain microscopic glass particles due to damage that occurred at the cylinder neck during the manufacturing process.
Apr 1, 2017Class IIZ-2066-2017Process designRemote possibility that certain solutions in these lots may contain microscopic glass particles due to damage that occurred at the cylinder neck during the manufacturing process.
Nov 6, 2014Class IIZ-0530-2015Unknown/Undetermined by firmAMO has received complaints where the finger grip dislodged while depressing the syringe plunger. The finger grip dislodgement could result in the surgeon's hand unintentionally moving the cannula further than intended, resulting in…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All LZP devices

LZP Aid, Surgical, Viscoelastic: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LZP

13in 2025

2007: 82008: 212009: 112010: 162011: 132012: 292013: 212014: 172015: 112016: 122017: 182018: 82019: 52020: 132021: 152022: 82023: 132024: 102025: 132026 (partial year): 7
2007high 29 (2012) · low 5 (2019)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LZP

Too few LZP 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · LZP

1in 2019

2008: 12010: 12013: 1, 1 Class I2014: 12019: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 1 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LZP

64in 2025

2007: 582008: 2032009: 342010: 1572011: 1062012: 1402013: 832014: 1192015: 682016: 1362017: 1622018: 1132019: 1562020: 1322021: 1572022: 1842023: 1072024: 762025: 64
2007high 203 (2008) · low 34 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LZP, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20078—058
200821—1203
200911—034
201016—1157
201113—0106
201229—0140
201321—1 (1)83
201417—1119
201511—068
201612—0136
201718—0162
20188—0113
20195—1156
202013—0132
202115—0157
20228—0184
202313—0107
202410—076
202513—064
20267—1—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P810031: Healon, Healon GV, HEALON5 Products Sodium Hyaluronate Ophthalmic Viscoelastic Devices.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P810031

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026