510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · 2004

Medstone 1050 Ectracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotript

P870015PMAApproved Apr 15, 1988368-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.5990Recalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medstone Intl., Inc. · LNS Lithotriptor, Extracorporeal Shock-Wave, Urological

Approved on Apr 15, 1988 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 368-day review. It has been recalled once.

Decided
Apr 15, 1988
Review
368 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LNS
Recalls
1

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P870015 has 28 supplements since 1988: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

1988: 31989: 11990: 11991: 21992: 41994: 21995: 21996: 31997: 21998: 31999: 32000: 2
1988high 4 (1992) · low 0 (1993)2000
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
19883
19891
19901
19912
19924
19942
19952
19963
19972
19983
19993
20002
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P870015, 1988–2000Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LNS? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LNS device

  1. #1 K252913 Break Wavescore 15.5 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jun 11, 2004Not classifiedZ-0884-04OtherUnits are defective in that the identification and certification labels were inadequate or missing. The beam limiting device was not appropriate for general purpose radiographic procedures and the beam limiting device could ot collimate…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All LNS devices

LNS Lithotriptor, Extracorporeal Shock-Wave, Urological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LNS

1in 2025

2007: 42008: 22009: 12011: 32012: 32013: 22014: 22015: 22017: 22020: 12021: 12023: 22025: 12026 (partial year): 2
2007high 4 (2007) · low 0 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LNS

111in 2012

2007: 146 days median2011: 307 days median2012: 111 days median
2007high 307 (2011) · low 111 (2012)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LNS

1in 2015

2015: 1
2007high 1 (2015) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LNS

61in 2025

2007: 42008: 102009: 22010: 152011: 212012: 202013: 182014: 212015: 222016: 502017: 542018: 592019: 602020: 382021: 552022: 522023: 862024: 402025: 61
2007high 86 (2023) · low 2 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LNS, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007414604
20082—010
20091—02
20100—015
20113307021
20123111020
20132—018
20142—021
20152—122
20160—050
20172—054
20180—059
20190—060
20201—038
20211—055
20220—052
20232—086
20240—040
20251—061
20262—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P870015: Medstone 1050 Ectracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotript.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P870015

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026