PMA · Approved
ApprovedPalmaz Balloon Expandable Stent
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Cordis US Corporation · NIN Stent, Renal
Approved on Sep 27, 1991 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 928-day review.
- Decided
- Sep 27, 1991
- Review
- 928 days
- Class
- Class III
- Product code
- NIN
- Recalls
- None
PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.
P890017 has 18 supplements since 1992: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.
PMA supplements approved per year
View FIG. 1 as a table
| Year | Supplements approved |
|---|---|
| 1992 | 1 |
| 1996 | 1 |
| 1998 | 1 |
| 1999 | 1 |
| 2000 | 3 |
| 2002 | 1 |
| 2003 | 1 |
| 2006 | 1 |
| 2009 | 1 |
| 2015 | 1 |
| 2016 | 3 |
| 2019 | 1 |
| 2022 | 2 |
Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in NIN? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
- Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
- Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Does it have a predicate?
PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
How does its category compare?
All NIN devicesNIN Stent, Renal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · NIN
2in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · NIN
Too few NIN 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · NIN
No recall names NIN since 2007.
Adverse event reports per year · NIN
42in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code NIN, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 0 | — | 0 | 8 |
| 2008 | 1 | — | 0 | 10 |
| 2009 | 4 | — | 0 | 11 |
| 2010 | 10 | — | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 13 | — | 0 | 21 |
| 2012 | 25 | — | 0 | 38 |
| 2013 | 11 | — | 0 | 45 |
| 2014 | 14 | — | 0 | 28 |
| 2015 | 8 | — | 0 | 70 |
| 2016 | 11 | — | 0 | 34 |
| 2017 | 12 | — | 0 | 61 |
| 2018 | 6 | — | 0 | 123 |
| 2019 | 4 | — | 0 | 62 |
| 2020 | 4 | — | 0 | 55 |
| 2021 | 4 | — | 0 | 47 |
| 2022 | 4 | — | 0 | 39 |
| 2023 | 6 | — | 0 | 47 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 53 |
| 2025 | 2 | — | 0 | 42 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
https://510kreport.com/device/P890017 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “P890017: Palmaz Balloon Expandable Stent.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P890017
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026