510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class II · 2020

Soflex UV-Absorbing Silicone Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens

P910056PMAApproved Jan 17, 1992121-day reviewClass III21 CFR 886.3600Recalls 2

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Bausch & Lomb, Inc. · HQL Intraocular Lens

Approved on Jan 17, 1992 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 121-day review. It has been recalled 2 times.

Decided
Jan 17, 1992
Review
121 days
Class
Class III
Product code
HQL
Recalls
2

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P910056 has 58 supplements since 1994: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

1994: 11995: 21997: 11999: 12003: 12012: 42013: 22014: 32015: 32016: 22017: 32018: 62019: 42020: 62021: 22022: 12023: 12024: 62025: 32026: 6
1994high 6 (2018) · low 0 (1996)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
19941
19952
19971
19991
20031
20124
20132
20143
20153
20162
20173
20186
20194
20206
20212
20221
20231
20246
20253
20266
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P910056, 1994–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HQL? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jun 9, 2020Class IIZ-2552-2020Unknown/Undetermined by firmThe toric axis marks were misaligned (from the expected position in relation to the haptics) on an implanted lens.
Nov 5, 2018Class IIZ-0628-2019Process controlCosmetic imperfections on the surface of some lenses.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All HQL devices

HQL Intraocular Lens: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HQL

42in 2025

2007: 512008: 482009: 332010: 442011: 322012: 382013: 302014: 182015: 272016: 482017: 412018: 392019: 572020: 492021: 532022: 342023: 292024: 352025: 422026 (partial year): 38
2007high 57 (2019) · low 18 (2014)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HQL

Too few HQL 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · HQL

3in 2018

2008: 12009: 22011: 92012: 12013: 12015: 2, 1 Class I2018: 3
2007high 9 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HQL

3,792in 2025

2007: 3,6402008: 3,1372009: 1,8682010: 2,1722011: 2,6722012: 2,8022013: 2,5552014: 2,6492015: 4,6732016: 2,2142017: 2,3862018: 2,5012019: 3,0862020: 1,9812021: 2,9252022: 3,2902023: 3,9062024: 3,1102025: 3,792
2007high 4,673 (2015) · low 1,868 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HQL, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200751—03,640
200848—13,137
200933—21,868
201044—02,172
201132—92,672
201238—12,802
201330—12,555
201418—02,649
201527—2 (1)4,673
201648—02,214
201741—02,386
201839—32,501
201957—03,086
202049—01,981
202153—02,925
202234—03,290
202329—03,906
202435—03,110
202542—03,792
202638—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P910056: Soflex UV-Absorbing Silicone Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P910056

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026