PMA · Approved
Recalled · Class III · 2018Autopap (R) 300 QC Automatic Pap Screener/QC System
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Bd Diagnostics · MNM Reader, Cervical Cytology Slide, Automated
Approved on Sep 29, 1995 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 217-day review. It has been recalled once.
- Decided
- Sep 29, 1995
- Review
- 217 days
- Class
- Class III
- Product code
- MNM
- Recalls
- 1
PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.
P950009 has 24 supplements since 1996: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.
PMA supplements approved per year
View FIG. 1 as a table
| Year | Supplements approved |
|---|---|
| 1996 | 1 |
| 1998 | 1 |
| 1999 | 1 |
| 2001 | 2 |
| 2008 | 1 |
| 2009 | 1 |
| 2010 | 3 |
| 2011 | 1 |
| 2012 | 2 |
| 2013 | 1 |
| 2014 | 1 |
| 2015 | 1 |
| 2016 | 3 |
| 2019 | 2 |
| 2021 | 2 |
| 2022 | 1 |
Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in MNM? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
- Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
- Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Does it have a predicate?
PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
Recalls of this device
| Date | Class | Recall | Root cause | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2018 | Class III | Z-0081-2019 | Under Investigation by firm | The device may not function at the lower end (<15 deg. C) of the labeled operating temperatures. The instrument returns to normal operating conditions when environmental temperatures are at or above 15 deg. C. This issue has no potential… |
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
How does its category compare?
All MNM devicesMNM Reader, Cervical Cytology Slide, Automated: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · MNM
1in 2022
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · MNM
Too few MNM 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.
Recalls per year · MNM
1in 2018
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · MNM
1in 2024
MAUDE reports naming product code MNM, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1 | — | 0 | 7 |
| 2009 | 1 | — | 0 | 22 |
| 2010 | 4 | — | 0 | 24 |
| 2011 | 1 | — | 0 | 6 |
| 2012 | 3 | — | 0 | 41 |
| 2013 | 1 | — | 0 | 12 |
| 2014 | 3 | — | 0 | 5 |
| 2015 | 3 | — | 0 | 3 |
| 2016 | 3 | — | 0 | 3 |
| 2017 | 0 | — | 0 | 8 |
| 2018 | 1 | — | 1 | 2 |
| 2019 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 2 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 1 | — | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
https://510kreport.com/device/P950009 · printed Nov 6, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “P950009: Autopap (R) 300 QC Automatic Pap Screener/QC System.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P950009
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026