510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · 2003

Prostatron

P950014PMAApproved May 3, 1996382-day reviewClass IIIRecalls 1

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Urologix, Inc. · MEQ System, Hyperthermia, Rf/Microwave (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia),Thermotherapy

Approved on May 3, 1996 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 382-day review. It has been recalled once.

Decided
May 3, 1996
Review
382 days
Class
Class III
Product code
MEQ
Recalls
1

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P950014 has 26 supplements since 1996: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

1996: 51997: 51998: 61999: 32000: 12001: 12004: 12005: 32008: 1
1996high 6 (1998) · low 0 (2002)2008
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
19965
19975
19986
19993
20001
20011
20041
20053
20081
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P950014, 1996–2008Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MEQ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 10, 2003Not classifiedZ-0345-04OtherDuring treatments, using the Prostatron units, the devices' Temperature Sensing System may change the rectal temperature reading by up to 2 degrees Celsius and may briefly delay updates to the rectal temperature reading.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All MEQ devices

MEQ System, Hyperthermia, Rf/Microwave (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia),Thermotherapy: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MEQ

1in 2021

2007: 112008: 142009: 102010: 72011: 62012: 42013: 22014: 42015: 22018: 12021: 1
2007high 14 (2008) · low 0 (2016)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MEQ

Too few MEQ 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · MEQ

1in 2011

2007: 22009: 12010: 12011: 1
2007high 2 (2007) · low 0 (2008)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MEQ

1in 2018

2007: 352008: 3582009: 3502010: 752011: 522012: 162013: 72014: 222015: 22018: 1
2007high 358 (2008) · low 0 (2016)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MEQ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200711—235
200814—0358
200910—1350
20107—175
20116—152
20124—016
20132—07
20144—022
20152—02
20160—00
20170—00
20181—01
20190—00
20200—00
20211—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P950014: Prostatron.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P950014

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026