510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Recalled · Class I · 2025

Medtronic Kappa 700/600 Series Pulse Generators and Model 9953 Software

P980035PMAApproved Jan 29, 1999157-day reviewClass IIIRecalls 16 (6 Class I)

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Medtronic, Inc. · NVZ Pulse Generator, Permanent, Implantable

Approved on Jan 29, 1999 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 157-day review. It has a Class I recall. It has been recalled 16 times, including 6 Class I recalls.

Decided
Jan 29, 1999
Review
157 days
Class
Class III
Product code
NVZ
Recalls
16 (6 Class I)

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P980035 has 822 supplements since 1999: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

1999: 62000: 22001: 82002: 62003: 92004: 82005: 72006: 182007: 142008: 382009: 232010: 482011: 542012: 412013: 562014: 442015: 442016: 352017: 472018: 422019: 382020: 562021: 302022: 372023: 322024: 342025: 252026: 20
1999high 56 (2013) · low 2 (2000)2026
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
19996
20002
20018
20026
20039
20048
20057
200618
200714
200838
200923
201048
201154
201241
201356
201444
201544
201635
201747
201842
201938
202056
202130
202237
202332
202434
202525
202620
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P980035, 1999–2026Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jun 17, 2025Class IIZ-2128-2025Software designA software update for Medtronic CareLink SmartSync Device Manager (SmartSync) is now available. The update eliminates the potential display of an erroneous electrical reset (pop-up) message upon interrogation with a SmartSync Device…
Jun 17, 2025Class IIZ-2127-2025Software designA software update for Medtronic CareLink SmartSync Device Manager (SmartSync) is now available. The update eliminates the potential display of an erroneous electrical reset (pop-up) message upon interrogation with a SmartSync Device…
Apr 29, 2025Class IIZ-1924-2025Process change controlIdentified devices may experience sudden battery power failure without alarm, power supply power-on-resets, and interruption of therapy. Potential patient harms include insufficient pacing support leading to cardiac arrest, syncope, or…
Jun 4, 2020Class IIZ-2507-2020Software designThere is a rare communication sequence during the first device interrogation with a SmartSync Device Manager that may result in the temporary suspension of some device features (i.e., battery measurements, Capture Management", Atrial Lead…
Jun 4, 2020Class IIZ-2508-2020Software designThere is a rare communication sequence during the first device interrogation with a SmartSync Device Manager that may result in the temporary suspension of some device features (i.e., battery measurements, Capture Management", Atrial Lead…
Jun 4, 2020Class IIZ-2509-2020Software designThere is a rare communication sequence during the first device interrogation with a SmartSync Device Manager that may result in the temporary suspension of some device features (i.e., battery measurements, Capture Management", Atrial Lead…
Jun 4, 2020Class IIZ-2510-2020Software designThere is a rare communication sequence during the first device interrogation with a SmartSync Device Manager that may result in the temporary suspension of some device features (i.e., battery measurements, Capture Management", Atrial Lead…
Jan 17, 2019Class IZ-0807-2019Component design/selectionA subset of Medtronic dual chamber pacemakers distributed worldwide between 10 March 2017 and 7 January 2019 under the brand names Adapta, Versa, and Sensia when programmed to a dual chamber mode with atrial-sensing, may experience a…
Jan 17, 2019Class IZ-0808-2019Component design/selectionA subset of Medtronic dual chamber pacemakers distributed worldwide between 10 March 2017 and 7 January 2019 under the brand names Adapta, Versa, and Sensia when programmed to a dual chamber mode with atrial-sensing, may experience a…
Jan 17, 2019Class IZ-0809-2019Component design/selectionA subset of Medtronic dual chamber pacemakers distributed worldwide between 10 March 2017 and 7 January 2019 under the brand names Adapta, Versa, and Sensia when programmed to a dual chamber mode with atrial-sensing, may experience a…
Jan 17, 2019Class IZ-0811-2019Component design/selectionA subset of Medtronic dual chamber pacemakers distributed worldwide between 10 March 2017 and 7 January 2019 under the brand names Adapta, Versa, and Sensia when programmed to a dual chamber mode with atrial-sensing, may experience a…
Jan 17, 2019Class IZ-0806-2019Component design/selectionA subset of Medtronic dual chamber pacemakers distributed worldwide between 10 March 2017 and 7 January 2019 under the brand names Adapta, Versa, and Sensia when programmed to a dual chamber mode with atrial-sensing, may experience a…
Jan 17, 2019Class IZ-0810-2019Component design/selectionA subset of Medtronic dual chamber pacemakers distributed worldwide between 10 March 2017 and 7 January 2019 under the brand names Adapta, Versa, and Sensia when programmed to a dual chamber mode with atrial-sensing, may experience a…
Apr 4, 2011Not classifiedZ-2120-2011Component design/selectionA rare measurement lock-up condition that may (at a rate of approximately 1 in 18,000 devices) inappropriately trigger ERI/RRT in the Medtronic Dual Chamber Pacemakers: Kappa 600, 700, 800, 900, EnPulse, Adapta, Versa, Sensia. This is…
Feb 11, 2010Not classifiedZ-1440-2010Nonconforming Material/ComponentMedtronic is informing doctors of two specific battery issues with EnRhythm pacemakers that will be addressed by a Medtronic software update available mid-2010. If the software update referenced above is not implemented, there will be a…
May 18, 2009Not classifiedZ-1515-2009Device DesignOne or more bond wire pairs will lift or separate from the bonding terminals on the device hybrid. This may present clinically as loss of rate response, premature battery depletion, loss of telemetry, or no output.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All NVZ devices

NVZ Pulse Generator, Permanent, Implantable: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · NVZ

39in 2025

2007: 1242008: 1642009: 1242010: 1812011: 1782012: 1302013: 1312014: 1222015: 882016: 762017: 612018: 592019: 602020: 732021: 402022: 442023: 392024: 422025: 392026 (partial year): 24
2007high 181 (2010) · low 39 (2023)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · NVZ

Too few NVZ 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · NVZ

2in 2024

2007: 22008: 12009: 42010: 12011: 12014: 12017: 22019: 7, 7 Class I2021: 12024: 22026 (partial year): 3
2007high 7 (2019) · low 0 (2012)2026

Class I (7 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · NVZ

5,970in 2025

2007: 852008: 1422009: 2452010: 4,0392011: 6,3342012: 5,5622013: 4,0332014: 3,1072015: 2,7732016: 2,5582017: 3,1642018: 5,8782019: 8,1882020: 8,3372021: 8,5382022: 7,7912023: 8,4632024: 6,4962025: 5,970
2007high 8,538 (2021) · low 85 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code NVZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007124—285
2008164—1142
2009124—4245
2010181—14,039
2011178—16,334
2012130—05,562
2013131—04,033
2014122—13,107
201588—02,773
201676—02,558
201761—23,164
201859—05,878
201960—7 (7)8,188
202073—08,337
202140—18,538
202244—07,791
202339—08,463
202442—26,496
202539—05,970
202624—3—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P980035: Medtronic Kappa 700/600 Series Pulse Generators and Model 9953 Software.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P980035

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026