510(k) Report

PMA · Approved

Approved

Zeiss Visulas 690 Laser and Visulink PDT Adapter

P990048PMAApproved Apr 12, 2000240-day reviewClass III

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Carl Zeiss Meditec, AG · MVF System, Laser, Photodynamic Therapy

Approved on Apr 12, 2000 through premarket approval, which rests on the device’s own clinical evidence after a 240-day review.

Decided
Apr 12, 2000
Review
240 days
Class
Class III
Product code
MVF
Recalls
None

PMA approvals rest on their own clinical evidence and do not claim a predicate, so this family tree starts here.

P990048 has 3 supplements since 2001: changes to the approved device, its labelling or its manufacturing, each approved separately.

PMA supplements approved per year

2001: 22008: 1
2001high 2 (2001) · low 0 (2002)2008
View FIG. 1 as a table
YearSupplements approved
20012
20081
FIG. 1 — Supplements to P990048, 2001–2008Source: FDA PMA database

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA PMA database (decision fields and supplements), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MVF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

PMA decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All MVF devices

MVF System, Laser, Photodynamic Therapy: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MVF

2in 2025

2008: 22009: 12010: 12011: 12013: 12016: 12018: 12022: 12023: 12025: 2
2007high 2 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MVF

Too few MVF 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · MVF

No recall names MVF since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · MVF

5in 2025

2007: 12012: 12013: 22014: 32015: 22017: 42018: 142019: 42020: 42021: 42022: 22023: 42024: 52025: 5
2007high 14 (2018) · low 0 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MVF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—01
20082—00
20091—00
20101—00
20111—00
20120—01
20131—02
20140—03
20150—02
20161—00
20170—04
20181—014
20190—04
20200—04
20210—04
20221—02
20231—04
20240—05
20252—05
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “P990048: Zeiss Visulas 690 Laser and Visulink PDT Adapter.” Lineage record from FDA PMA data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/P990048

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026