510(k) Report

FDA product code · Anesthesiology

Flowmeter, Tube, Thorpe, Back-Pressure Compensated

CAXClass I21 CFR 868.2340510(k) exempt24 decisions since 19761 recall

FDA lists CAX as exempt from 510(k): a device of this type needs no clearance unless one of the limits in 21 CFR 868.9 applies, such as a new intended use or a different fundamental technology. 24 FDA decisions since 1976. 1 recall names this code; it is not Class I. The most-cited predicate is K923781, named by 1 later device.

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026 Download the data (CSV)

FIG. A — Illustration, anesthesiology panel

Twenty years of CAX at a glance: how often FDA decides these devices, how long 510(k) reviews take, how often they are recalled, and how many adverse event reports name the code.

FDA decisions per year · CAX

FDA has decided no CAX device since 2007.

Median 510(k) review, days · CAX

Too few CAX 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · CAX

1in 2008

2008: 1
2007high 1 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · CAX

4in 2025

2007: 52008: 42009: 272010: 72011: 132012: 52013: 52014: 12015: 22017: 42018: 32019: 62020: 12021: 62022: 12023: 32024: 12025: 4
2007high 27 (2009) · low 0 (2016)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code CAX, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—05
20080—14
20090—027
20100—07
20110—013
20120—05
20130—05
20140—01
20150—02
20160—00
20170—04
20180—03
20190—06
20200—01
20210—06
20220—01
20230—03
20240—01
20250—04
20260—0—
FIG. 1 — CAX by year, 2007–2026Sources: FDA decision databases, recall and enforcement reports, MAUDE · Data through Oct 25, 2026

Planning a device in CAX? A 510(k) Report ranks candidate predicates in this code by lineage, citations and recall history, with the review-time outlook.

See the 510(k) Report