510(k) Report

FDA product code · Ear, nose and throat

Cochlear Implant With Combined Electrical Stimulation And Acoustic Amplification

PGQClass IIIPMA required1 decision since 20140 recalls

1 FDA decision since 2014. No recall names this code.

Intended to provide electric stimulation to the mid to high frequency region of the cochlea and acoustic amplification to the low frequency regions, for patients with residual low frequency hearing sensitivity.

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026 Download the data (CSV)

FIG. A — Illustration, ear, nose and throat panel

Twenty years of PGQ at a glance: how often FDA decides these devices, how long 510(k) reviews take, how often they are recalled, and how many adverse event reports name the code.

FDA decisions per year · PGQ

2in 2025

2014: 92015: 42016: 102017: 112018: 42019: 32020: 62021: 12022: 62023: 42024: 12025: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 11 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · PGQ

Too few PGQ 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · PGQ

No recall names PGQ since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · PGQ

25in 2025

2014: 12016: 292017: 262018: 142019: 302020: 272021: 282022: 212023: 272024: 212025: 25
2007high 30 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code PGQ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20149—01
20154—00
201610—029
201711—026
20184—014
20193—030
20206—027
20211—028
20226—021
20234—027
20241—021
20252—025
20262—0—
FIG. 1 — PGQ by year, 2007–2026Sources: FDA decision databases, recall and enforcement reports, MAUDE · Data through Oct 25, 2026

Planning a device in PGQ? A 510(k) Report ranks candidate predicates in this code by lineage, citations and recall history, with the review-time outlook.

See the 510(k) Report