510(k) Report

FDA product code · Ophthalmic

Oral Electronic Vision Aid

PICClass II21 CFR 886.5905510(k) required2 decisions since 20151 recall

2 FDA decisions since 2015. 1 recall names this code; it is not Class I. The most-cited predicate is DEN130039, named by 1 later device.

To use as an oral electronic vision aid in conjunction with other assistive devices (e.g., the white cane, guide dog, etc.)

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026 Download the data (CSV)

FIG. A — Illustration, ophthalmic panel

Twenty years of PIC at a glance: how often FDA decides these devices, how long 510(k) reviews take, how often they are recalled, and how many adverse event reports name the code.

FDA decisions per year · PIC

2in 2015

2015: 2
2007high 2 (2015) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · PIC

Too few PIC 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · PIC

1in 2019

2019: 1
2007high 1 (2019) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · PIC

No MAUDE report names PIC since 2007.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20152—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—10
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—
FIG. 1 — PIC by year, 2007–2026Sources: FDA decision databases, recall and enforcement reports, MAUDE · Data through Oct 25, 2026

Planning a device in PIC? A 510(k) Report ranks candidate predicates in this code by lineage, citations and recall history, with the review-time outlook.

See the 510(k) Report