510(k) Report

FDA product code · General and plastic surgery

Focused Ultrasound System For Non-Thermal, Mechanical Tissue Ablation

QGMClass II21 CFR 878.4405510(k) required3 decisions since 20230 recalls

3 FDA decisions since 2023. 510(k) reviews decided 2021–2025 took a median of 131 days (half between 126 and 136). No recall names this code. The most-cited predicate is DEN220087, named by 1 later device.

This device uses focused ultrasound to mechanically ablate soft tissue. The device is not intended to thermally ablate tissue.

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026 Download the data (CSV)

FIG. A — Illustration, general and plastic surgery panel

Twenty years of QGM at a glance: how often FDA decides these devices, how long 510(k) reviews take, how often they are recalled, and how many adverse event reports name the code.

FDA decisions per year · QGM

2in 2024

2023: 12024: 2
2007high 2 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · QGM

Too few QGM 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · QGM

No recall names QGM since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · QGM

43in 2025

2024: 32025: 43
2007high 43 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code QGM, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20231—00
20242—03
20250—043
20260—0—
FIG. 1 — QGM by year, 2007–2026Sources: FDA decision databases, recall and enforcement reports, MAUDE · Data through Oct 25, 2026

Planning a device in QGM? A 510(k) Report ranks candidate predicates in this code by lineage, citations and recall history, with the review-time outlook.

See the 510(k) Report