510(k) Report

FDA product code · Obstetrics and gynecology

Automated Cryopreservation Storage System

QUJClass II21 CFR 884.6120510(k) exempt1 decision since 20220 recalls

FDA lists QUJ as exempt from 510(k): a device of this type needs no clearance unless one of the limits in 21 CFR 884.9 applies, such as a new intended use or a different fundamental technology. 1 FDA decision since 2022. 510(k) reviews decided 2021–2025 took a median of 205 days (half between 205 and 205). No recall names this code.

To provide an automated liquid nitrogen storage system for oocytes, embryos, and sperm.

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026 Download the data (CSV)

FIG. A — Illustration, obstetrics and gynecology panel

Twenty years of QUJ at a glance: how often FDA decides these devices, how long 510(k) reviews take, how often they are recalled, and how many adverse event reports name the code.

FDA decisions per year · QUJ

1in 2022

2022: 1
2007high 1 (2022) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · QUJ

Too few QUJ 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · QUJ

No recall names QUJ since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · QUJ

No MAUDE report names QUJ since 2007.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20221—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—
FIG. 1 — QUJ by year, 2007–2026Sources: FDA decision databases, recall and enforcement reports, MAUDE · Data through Oct 25, 2026

Planning a device in QUJ? A 510(k) Report ranks candidate predicates in this code by lineage, citations and recall history, with the review-time outlook.

See the 510(k) Report

Related product codes

Other codes under 21 CFR 884.6120.