510(k) Report

FDA product code · Cardiovascular

Esophageal Protection Device For Use In Percutaneous Cardiac Catheter Ablation Procedures, Mechanical Deviation

QXUClass II21 CFR 870.5710510(k) required2 decisions since 20230 recalls

2 FDA decisions since 2023. 510(k) reviews decided 2021–2025 took a median of 31 days (half between 31 and 31). No recall names this code. The most-cited predicate is DEN230006, named by 1 later device.

This device is placed in the lumen of the esophagus to reduce the likelihood of esophageal injury or a specific adverse event during cardiac ablation procedures. The device uses mechanical means to deviate the esophagus away from the source of ablation energy

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026 Download the data (CSV)

FIG. A — Illustration, cardiovascular panel

Twenty years of QXU at a glance: how often FDA decides these devices, how long 510(k) reviews take, how often they are recalled, and how many adverse event reports name the code.

FDA decisions per year · QXU

1in 2024

2023: 12024: 1
2007high 1 (2023) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · QXU

Too few QXU 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · QXU

No recall names QXU since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · QXU

No MAUDE report names QXU since 2007.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20231—00
20241—00
20250—00
20260—0—
FIG. 1 — QXU by year, 2007–2026Sources: FDA decision databases, recall and enforcement reports, MAUDE · Data through Oct 25, 2026

Planning a device in QXU? A 510(k) Report ranks candidate predicates in this code by lineage, citations and recall history, with the review-time outlook.

See the 510(k) Report