510(k) Report

De Novo · Granted

Granted

Lumipulse G ß-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40)

DEN200072De NovoGranted May 4, 2022530-day reviewClass II21 CFR 866.5840

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Fujirebio Diagnostics,Inc. · QSE Alzheimer’S Disease Pathology Assessment Test

Granted on May 4, 2022 as a new device type through De Novo after a 530-day review. 1 of the 11 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 10 later devices descend from it.

Decided
May 4, 2022
Review
530 days
Class
Class II
Product code
QSE
Recalls
None

10 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly. 1 of the 11 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Descendants, by year cleared 2022: 1 descendant cleared2025: 2 descendants cleared2024: 1 descendant cleared, 1 with a Class I recall12026: 5 descendants cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2020202220242026
  1. This deviceDEN200072 Lumipulse G ß-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40)Fujirebio Diagnostics,Inc. · 2022
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 3 of its ownK233472 CVAC Aspiration System + CVAC Image ProcessorCalyxo, Inc. · 2024 · Recalled (Class I)
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK221842 Elecsys B-Amyloid (1-42) CSF II, Elecsys Phospho-Tau (181P) CSFRoche Diagnostics · 2022
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK242706 Lumipulse G pTau217/ß-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma RatioFujirebio Diagnostics,Inc. · 2025 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK261447 CVAC® Aspiration SystemCalyxo, Inc. · 2026
  6. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK253240 PrecivityAD2 TestC2N Diagnostics, LLC · 2026

Showing 5 of 10 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2022: 12023: 12024: 12025: 22026: 5
2022high 5 (2026) · low 1 (2022)2026

Class I recalls in this family

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 10 · See all
  • K233472CVAC Aspiration System + CVAC Image ProcessorCalyxo, Inc. · 2024 · cites it directly3descendants
  • K221842Elecsys B-Amyloid (1-42) CSF II, Elecsys Phospho-Tau (181P) CSFRoche Diagnostics · 2022 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K242706Lumipulse G pTau217/ß-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma RatioFujirebio Diagnostics,Inc. · 2025 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K261447CVAC® Aspiration SystemCalyxo, Inc. · 2026 · 2 generations on0descendants
  • K253240PrecivityAD2 TestC2N Diagnostics, LLC · 2026 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)DEN200072Lumipulse G ß-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40)Fujirebio Diagnostics,Inc.2022—
+1K233472CVAC Aspiration System + CVAC Image ProcessorCalyxo, Inc.2024Class I
+1K221842Elecsys B-Amyloid (1-42) CSF II, Elecsys Phospho-Tau (181P) CSFRoche Diagnostics2022—
+1K242706Lumipulse G pTau217/ß-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma RatioFujirebio Diagnostics,Inc.20257
+2K261447CVAC® Aspiration SystemCalyxo, Inc.2026—
+1K253240PrecivityAD2 TestC2N Diagnostics, LLC2026—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202210
202310
202411
202520
202650
FIG. 1 — Lineage of DEN200072, 2022–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA De Novo database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new QSE device

  1. #1 K221842 Elecsys B-Amyloid (1-42) CSF II, Elecsys…score 10.5 · 1 generation · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

Does it have a predicate?

De Novo decisions do not claim a predicate device.

What descends from it? (10)

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K233472CVAC Aspiration System + CVAC Image Processor Class ICalyxo, Inc.20243
K221842Elecsys B-Amyloid (1-42) CSF II, Elecsys Phospho-Tau (181P) CSFRoche Diagnostics20222
K242706Lumipulse G pTau217/ß-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma RatioFujirebio Diagnostics,Inc.20251
K253240PrecivityAD2 TestC2N Diagnostics, LLC20260

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

Relatives with a Class I recall

Class I is FDA’s most serious recall class. A recall in the family tree is context for this device, not evidence about it.

  • K233472CVAC Aspiration System + CVAC Image ProcessorCalyxo, Inc. · 2024 · Cites it directly · ◆ in the 2024 descendants bar of FIG. 11 Class I recall

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K233472 (Calyxo, Inc., 2024) has gone furthest, with 3 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All QSE devices

QSE Alzheimer’S Disease Pathology Assessment Test: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2022, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · QSE

1in 2023

2022: 22023: 1
2007high 2 (2022) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · QSE

Too few QSE 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · QSE

No recall names QSE since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · QSE

No MAUDE report names QSE since 2007.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20222—00
20231—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Lumipulse G β-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40) is an in vitro cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) test that combines the results of Lumipulse G β-Amyloid 1-42 and Lumipulse G β-Amyloid 1-40 assays into a ratio of β-amyloid 1-42 to β-amyloid 1-40 concentrations using the LUMIPULSE G1200 System. The Lumipulse G β-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40) is intended to be used in adult patients, aged 55 years and older, presenting with cognitive impairment who are being evaluated…

Read the full statement (233 words)

The Lumipulse G β-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40) is an in vitro cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) test that combines the results of Lumipulse G β-Amyloid 1-42 and Lumipulse G β-Amyloid 1-40 assays into a ratio of β-amyloid 1-42 to β-amyloid 1-40 concentrations using the LUMIPULSE G1200 System.

The Lumipulse G β-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40) is intended to be used in adult patients, aged 55 years and older, presenting with cognitive impairment who are being evaluated for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other causes of cognitive decline.

A test result ≥ 0.073 is a negative result which is consistent with a negative amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scan result. A negative result reduces the likelihood that a patient’s cognitive impairment is due to AD.

A test result ≤ 0.058 is a positive result which is consistent with a positive amyloid PET scan result. A positive result does not establish a diagnosis of AD or other cognitive disorder.

A test result between 0.059 and 0.072 is considered as a likely positive result as it is more likely consistent with a positive amyloid PET scan result. A likely positive result does not establish a diagnosis of AD or other cognitive disorders and has increased uncertainty in regard to amyloid PET positivity.

The Lumipulse G β-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40) results must be interpreted in conjunction with other patient clinical information.

This test is not intended as a screening or stand-alone diagnostic test.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “DEN200072: Lumipulse G ß-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40).” Lineage record from FDA De Novo data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 3, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/DEN200072

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026