510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2025

Lumipulse G pTau217/ß-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio

K242706510(k) TraditionalCleared May 16, 2025249-day reviewClass II21 CFR 866.5840Recalls 7

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Fujirebio Diagnostics,Inc. · SET Immunoassay Blood Test For Amyloid Pathology Assessment

Cleared on May 16, 2025 as substantially equivalent to DEN200072 (Fujirebio Diagnostics,Inc., 2022) after a 249-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2022. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled 7 times.

Decided
May 16, 2025
Review
249 days
Class
Class II
Product code
SET
Recalls
7
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to DEN200072 (2022). 1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2026: 1 descendant clearedDEN200072 · Lumipulse G ß-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40) · Fujirebio Diagnostics,Inc. · 20222020202220242026
Descendants, by generation 1 generation forward: 1 descendant DEN200072 · Lumipulse G ß-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40) · Fujirebio Diagnostics,Inc. · 20220
  1. Root · 1 generation backDEN200072 Lumipulse G ß-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40)Fujirebio Diagnostics,Inc. · 2022
  2. This deviceK242706 Lumipulse G pTau217/ß-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma RatioFujirebio Diagnostics,Inc. · 2025
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK261686 Elecsys Phospho-Tau (217P) PlasmaRoche Diagnostics · 2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K261686Elecsys Phospho-Tau (217P) PlasmaRoche Diagnostics · 2026 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1DEN200072Lumipulse G ß-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40)Fujirebio Diagnostics,Inc.2022—
0 (this device)K242706Lumipulse G pTau217/ß-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma RatioFujirebio Diagnostics,Inc.2025—
+1K261686Elecsys Phospho-Tau (217P) PlasmaRoche Diagnostics2026—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K242706, 2022–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in SET? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new SET device

  1. #1 K261686 Elecsys Phospho-Tau (217P) Plasmascore 12.2 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*DEN200072Lumipulse G ß-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40)
Summary page 11
…CE INFORMATION: A. Predicate Device Name(s): Lumipulse G β-Amyloid Ratio (1-42/1-40) B. Predicate 510(k) Number(s): DEN200072 C. Comparison with Predicate(s): Similarities and Differences…
Fujirebio Diagnostics,Inc.2022—

Also cleared against DEN200072: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K261686Elecsys Phospho-Tau (217P) PlasmaRoche Diagnostics20260

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Dec 11, 2025Class IIZ-1301-2026Under Investigation by firmCustomers may experience inaccurate test results by observing a higher frequency of classification in the indeterminate and positive zone and/or low specificity when compared back to FDA-cleared CSF ratio/PET imaging, due to falsely…
Dec 11, 2025Class IIZ-1304-2026Under Investigation by firmCustomers may experience inaccurate test results by observing a higher frequency of classification in the indeterminate and positive zone and/or low specificity when compared back to FDA-cleared CSF ratio/PET imaging, due to falsely…
Dec 11, 2025Class IIZ-1302-2026Under Investigation by firmCustomers may experience inaccurate test results by observing a higher frequency of classification in the indeterminate and positive zone and/or low specificity when compared back to FDA-cleared CSF ratio/PET imaging, due to falsely…
Dec 11, 2025Class IIZ-1306-2026Under Investigation by firmCustomers may experience inaccurate test results by observing a higher frequency of classification in the indeterminate and positive zone and/or low specificity when compared back to FDA-cleared CSF ratio/PET imaging, due to falsely…
Dec 11, 2025Class IIZ-1303-2026Under Investigation by firmCustomers may experience inaccurate test results by observing a higher frequency of classification in the indeterminate and positive zone and/or low specificity when compared back to FDA-cleared CSF ratio/PET imaging, due to falsely…
Dec 11, 2025Class IIZ-1305-2026Under Investigation by firmCustomers may experience inaccurate test results by observing a higher frequency of classification in the indeterminate and positive zone and/or low specificity when compared back to FDA-cleared CSF ratio/PET imaging, due to falsely…
Dec 11, 2025Class IIZ-1307-2026Under Investigation by firmCustomers may experience inaccurate test results by observing a higher frequency of classification in the indeterminate and positive zone and/or low specificity when compared back to FDA-cleared CSF ratio/PET imaging, due to falsely…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • Of its descendants, K261686 (Roche Diagnostics, 2026) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate DEN200072.

How does its category compare?

All SET devices

SET Immunoassay Blood Test For Amyloid Pathology Assessment: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years. 2025, this device’s year, is highlighted.

FDA decisions per year · SET

2in 2025

2025: 22026 (partial year): 2
2007high 2 (2025) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · SET

Too few SET 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · SET

No recall names SET since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · SET

No MAUDE report names SET since 2007.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—00
20120—00
20130—00
20140—00
20150—00
20160—00
20170—00
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20252—00
20262—0—

What is it indicated for?

The Lumipulse G pTau 217/P-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio is an in vitro test using human plasma (K2EDTA) that combines the results of Lumipulse G pTau 217 Plasma and Lumipulse G P-Amyloid 1-42-N Plasma assays into a ratio of pTau 217 to P-Amyloid 1-42 concentrations using the Lumipulse Gl 200 System. The Lumipulse G pTau 217/P-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio is intended to aid healthcare providers to identify patients with amyloid pathology associated with…

Read the full statement (232 words)

The Lumipulse G pTau 217/P-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio is an in vitro test using human plasma (K2EDTA)

that combines the results of Lumipulse G pTau 217 Plasma and Lumipulse G P-Amyloid 1-42-N Plasma

assays into a ratio of pTau 217 to P-Amyloid 1-42 concentrations using the Lumipulse Gl 200 System.

The Lumipulse G pTau 217/P-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio is intended to aid healthcare providers to

identify patients with amyloid pathology associated with Alzheimer's disease.

The Lumipulse G pTau 217/P-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio is indicated for adult patients, aged 50 years and

older, presenting at a specialized care setting with signs and symptoms of cognitive decline.

A test results; 0.00370 is a negative result which is consistent with patients who are unlikely to have

amyloid pathology. These patients should be investigated for other causes of cognitive decline.

A test result� 0.00738 is a positive result which is consistent with patients who are likely to have amyloid

pathology. This result does not establish a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease or other cognitive disorders.

A test result between 0.00371 and 0.00737 is an indeterminate result which is consistent with patients

who are uncertain to have amyloid pathology. These patients should be considered for further testing.

The Lumipulse G pTau 217/P-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio results must be interpreted in conjunction with

other patient clinical information.

This test is not intended as a screening or stand-alone diagnostic test.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K242706: Lumipulse G pTau217/ß-Amyloid 1-42 Plasma Ratio.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K242706

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026