510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2026

Hydrophilic Silicone Foley Catheter and Personal Catheter (Hydrophilic and Non-Hydrophilic)

K000723510(k) TraditionalCleared May 19, 200074-day reviewClass II21 CFR 876.5130Recalls 26

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Rochester Medical Corp. · KOD Catheter, Urological

Cleared on May 19, 2000 after a 74-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. 11 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 26 times.

Decided
May 19, 2000
Review
74 days
Class
Class II
Product code
KOD
Recalls
26
Predicates
0

11 later devices descend from it, 4 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2017: 2 descendants cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2004: 1 descendant cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2009: 1 descendant cleared2014: 1 descendant cleared2015: 1 descendant cleared2010: 1 descendant cleared2023: 1 descendant cleared2026: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK000723 Hydrophilic Silicone Foley Catheter and Personal Catheter…Rochester Medical Corp. · 2000
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 6 of its ownK070508 Bardex Lubri-Sil All-Silicone Lubricious Coated Foley Catheter 6 FRC.R. Bard, Inc. · 2007 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 4 of its ownK091699 Amsure Hydrophilic Latex Foley CatheterAmsino International, Inc. · 2009
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 2 of its ownK162989 Rusch Simplastic Foley CathetersTeleflexmedical, Inc. · 2017
  5. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK122785 Hydrosil; Magic; Personal CatheterRochester Medical Corp. · 2013 · Recalled
  6. Descendant · 4 generations on · 1 of its ownK212077 Teleflex Rusch SoftSimplastic Foley CathetersTeleflexmedical, Inc. · 2023

Showing 5 of 11 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2004: 12007: 12009: 12010: 12013: 12014: 12015: 12017: 22023: 12026: 1
2004high 2 (2017) · low 0 (2005)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 11 · See all
  • K070508Bardex Lubri-Sil All-Silicone Lubricious Coated Foley Catheter 6 FRC.R. Bard, Inc. · 2007 · cites it directly6descendants
  • K091699Amsure Hydrophilic Latex Foley CatheterAmsino International, Inc. · 2009 · 2 generations on4descendants
  • K162989Rusch Simplastic Foley CathetersTeleflexmedical, Inc. · 2017 · 3 generations on2descendants
  • K122785Hydrosil; Magic; Personal CatheterRochester Medical Corp. · 2013 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K212077Teleflex Rusch SoftSimplastic Foley CathetersTeleflexmedical, Inc. · 2023 · 4 generations on1descendant
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K000723Hydrophilic Silicone Foley Catheter and Personal Catheter (Hydrophilic and…Rochester Medical Corp.2000—
+1K070508Bardex Lubri-Sil All-Silicone Lubricious Coated Foley Catheter 6 FRC.R. Bard, Inc.20071
+2K091699Amsure Hydrophilic Latex Foley CatheterAmsino International, Inc.2009—
+3K162989Rusch Simplastic Foley CathetersTeleflexmedical, Inc.2017—
+1K122785Hydrosil; Magic; Personal CatheterRochester Medical Corp.20133
+4K212077Teleflex Rusch SoftSimplastic Foley CathetersTeleflexmedical, Inc.2023—

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200410
200710
200910
201010
201310
201410
201510
201720
202310
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K000723, 2000–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in KOD? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new KOD device

  1. #1 K251864 Rubber Utility Catheterscore 10.9 · 1 generation · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (11)

See all 11

4 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K070508Bardex Lubri-Sil All-Silicone Lubricious Coated Foley Catheter 6 FRC.R. Bard, Inc.20076
K122785Hydrosil; Magic; Personal CatheterRochester Medical Corp.20132
K172247Magic3 Go Intermittent Urinary CatheterC.R. Bard, Inc.20170
K033477Hydrophilic-Antibacterial Intermittent Catheter, Intermittent Catheter Closed System KitRochester Medical Corp.20040

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jun 25, 2026Class IIZ-3117-2026Under Investigation by firmDue to complaints received indicating presence of contamination on the surface of pericare wipes provided with various Foley and Intermittent Catheter Trays.
Jan 27, 2022Class IIZ-0666-2022Under Investigation by firmThere is a potential to leak from the catheter where it connects to the drain bag
Jan 27, 2022Class IIZ-0667-2022Under Investigation by firmThere is a potential to leak from the catheter where it connects to the drain bag
Sep 14, 2017Class IIZ-1307-2018Process controlSeveral instances of a catheter caught in the sterile barrier seal and in some instances cut catheters were observed.
Sep 14, 2017Class IIZ-1308-2018Process controlSeveral instances of a catheter caught in the sterile barrier seal and in some instances cut catheters were observed.
Sep 14, 2017Class IIZ-1309-2018Process controlSeveral instances of a catheter caught in the sterile barrier seal and in some instances cut catheters were observed.
Aug 24, 2015Class IIZ-2732-2015Unknown/Undetermined by firmPotential breach of the sterile barrier packaging.
Jul 7, 2015Class IIZ-2385-2015Unknown/Undetermined by firmPotential breach of the sterile barrier packaging.
Jul 7, 2015Class IIZ-2384-2015Unknown/Undetermined by firmPotential breach of the sterile barrier packaging.
Jul 7, 2015Class IIZ-2386-2015Unknown/Undetermined by firmPotential breach of the sterile barrier packaging.
Jul 7, 2015Class IIZ-2387-2015Unknown/Undetermined by firmPotential breach of the sterile barrier packaging.
Jul 7, 2015Class IIZ-2388-2015Unknown/Undetermined by firmPotential breach of the sterile barrier packaging.
Jan 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1086-2009Package design/selectionRochester Medical observed some Magic3 and HydroSil(R) catheter packages in which the catheter was caught in the package seal during the packaging process.
Jan 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1087-2009Package design/selectionRochester Medical observed some Magic3 and HydroSil(R) catheter packages in which the catheter was caught in the package seal during the packaging process.
Jan 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1077-2009Package design/selectionRochester Medical observed some Magic3 and HydroSil(R) catheter packages in which the catheter was caught in the package seal during the packaging process.
Jan 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1076-2009Package design/selectionRochester Medical observed some Magic3 and HydroSil(R) catheter packages in which the catheter was caught in the package seal during the packaging process.
Jan 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1081-2009Package design/selectionRochester Medical observed some Magic3 and HydroSil(R) catheter packages in which the catheter was caught in the package seal during the packaging process.
Jan 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1083-2009Package design/selectionRochester Medical observed some Magic3 and HydroSil(R) catheter packages in which the catheter was caught in the package seal during the packaging process.
Jan 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1080-2009Package design/selectionRochester Medical observed some Magic3 and HydroSil(R) catheter packages in which the catheter was caught in the package seal during the packaging process.
Jan 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1074-2009Package design/selectionRochester Medical observed some Magic3 and HydroSil(R) catheter packages in which the catheter was caught in the package seal during the packaging process.
Jan 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1085-2009Package design/selectionRochester Medical observed some Magic3 and HydroSil(R) catheter packages in which the catheter was caught in the package seal during the packaging process.
Jan 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1075-2009Package design/selectionRochester Medical observed some Magic3 and HydroSil(R) catheter packages in which the catheter was caught in the package seal during the packaging process.
Jan 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1082-2009Package design/selectionRochester Medical observed some Magic3 and HydroSil(R) catheter packages in which the catheter was caught in the package seal during the packaging process.
Jan 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1078-2009Package design/selectionRochester Medical observed some Magic3 and HydroSil(R) catheter packages in which the catheter was caught in the package seal during the packaging process.
Jan 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1084-2009Package design/selectionRochester Medical observed some Magic3 and HydroSil(R) catheter packages in which the catheter was caught in the package seal during the packaging process.
Jan 14, 2009Not classifiedZ-1079-2009Package design/selectionRochester Medical observed some Magic3 and HydroSil(R) catheter packages in which the catheter was caught in the package seal during the packaging process.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K070508 (C.R. Bard, Inc., 2007) has gone furthest, with 6 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All KOD devices

KOD Catheter, Urological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · KOD

2in 2022

2008: 22009: 12010: 12011: 22014: 12016: 22017: 12018: 62019: 12021: 12022: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 6 (2018) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · KOD

251in 2018

2018: 251 days median
2007high 251 (2018)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · KOD

1in 2023

2009: 152010: 12011: 472012: 22016: 12019: 12022: 32023: 1, 1 Class I2026 (partial year): 1
2007high 47 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (1 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · KOD

1,389in 2025

2007: 1802008: 1022009: 1832010: 2282011: 2092012: 1652013: 3932014: 2262015: 4182016: 2842017: 1,8732018: 1,1792019: 1,1672020: 1,3702021: 1,3882022: 1,2802023: 1,1602024: 1,2592025: 1,389
2007high 1,873 (2017) · low 102 (2008)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code KOD, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—0180
20082—0102
20091—15183
20101—1228
20112—47209
20120—2165
20130—0393
20141—0226
20150—0418
20162—1284
20171—01,873
2018625101,179
20191—11,167
20200—01,370
20211—01,388
20222—31,280
20230—1 (1)1,160
20240—01,259
20250—01,389
20261—1—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K000723: Hydrophilic Silicone Foley Catheter and Personal Catheter (Hydrophilic and Non-Hydrophilic).” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K000723

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026