510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2024

H-Scribe

K004017510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 11, 2001166-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.2800Recalls 2

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Mortara Instrument, Inc. · MLO Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory, With Analysis Algorithm

Cleared on Jun 11, 2001 as substantially equivalent to K900607 (Cardiodata Corp., 1990) and 1 other predicate after a 166-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1994. 4 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 2 times.

Decided
Jun 11, 2001
Review
166 days
Class
Class II
Product code
MLO
Recalls
2
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K930806 (1994). 3 ancestors in all, the oldest K900607 (1990). 4 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 1990: 1 other ancestor2004: 1 descendant cleared2020: 1 descendant cleared2022: 1 descendant cleared2025: 1 descendant clearedK930806 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Agilent Technologies · 1994K955015 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 19961990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant3 generations forward: 1 descendant4 generations forward: 1 descendant K955015 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 1996K930806 · Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010 · Agilent Technologies · 19940
  1. Root · 2 generations backK930806 Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Agilent Technologies · 1994
  2. 1 generation backK955015 Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Zymed Medical Instrumentation · 1996
  3. This deviceK004017 H-ScribeMortara Instrument, Inc. · 2001
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 3 of its ownK042002 Synescope, Easyscope, Synecom, HolterreaderEla Medical, Inc. · 2004
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 2 of its ownK193177 CER-SCardiocalm · 2020
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 1 of its ownK213861 CER-SCardiocalm Srl · 2022
  7. Descendant · 4 generations on · 0 of its ownK243312 CER-SCardiocalm Srl · 2025

Most influential descendants

Showing 4 of 4 · See all
  • K042002Synescope, Easyscope, Synecom, HolterreaderEla Medical, Inc. · 2004 · cites it directly3descendants
  • K193177CER-SCardiocalm · 2020 · 2 generations on2descendants
  • K213861CER-SCardiocalm Srl · 2022 · 3 generations on1descendant
  • K243312CER-SCardiocalm Srl · 2025 · 4 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K930806Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Agilent Technologies1994—
−1K955015Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010Zymed Medical Instrumentation1996—
0 (this device)K004017H-ScribeMortara Instrument, Inc.2001—
+1K042002Synescope, Easyscope, Synecom, HolterreaderEla Medical, Inc.2004—
+2K193177CER-SCardiocalm2020—
+3K213861CER-SCardiocalm Srl2022—
+4K243312CER-SCardiocalm Srl2025—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199010

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200410
202010
202210
202510
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K004017, 1994–2025Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in MLO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new MLO device

  1. #1 K261580 ZBPro Diagnostic (Version 2.0)score 13.8 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K900607MK5 Detector & Alarm, Arrhythmia W/Software 2.11
Summary page 1
…mmable Diagnostic Computer (Per 21 CFR 870.1425) Legally marketed devices to which S.E. is claimed Cardiodata MK5 Holter Analysis System - 51O(k) K900607 Zymed Holter Scanner, Model 2010 Plus - 51O(k) K 955015 Description: The H-Scribe Holter Analysis system…
Cardiodata Corp.1990—
*K955015Zymed Holter Scanner Model 2010
Summary page 1
…which S.E. is claimed Cardiodata MK5 Holter Analysis System - 51O(k) K900607 Zymed Holter Scanner, Model 2010 Plus - 51O(k) K 955015 Description: The H-Scribe Holter Analysis system is a PC based diagnostic tool consisting of a Holter analysis software applica…
Zymed Medical Instrumentation1996—

What descends from it? (4)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K042002Synescope, Easyscope, Synecom, HolterreaderEla Medical, Inc.20043

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Oct 11, 2024Class IIZ-0320-2025Software designThere is the potential for exam files being assigned duplicate Unique Identifiers (UIDs),. If the system receiving the DICOM file (e.g., Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS)) relies solely on the UID to accept exams, this…
Oct 11, 2024Class IIZ-0323-2025Software designThere is the potential for exam files being assigned duplicate Unique Identifiers (UIDs),. If the system receiving the DICOM file (e.g., Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS)) relies solely on the UID to accept exams, this…

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 7 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 5.2 years on median.
  • None of the 3 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K042002 (Ela Medical, Inc., 2004) has gone furthest, with 3 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All MLO devices

MLO Electrocardiograph, Ambulatory, With Analysis Algorithm: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · MLO

1in 2025

2007: 12010: 12011: 32012: 12013: 22014: 12018: 12020: 22024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 1
2007high 3 (2011) · low 0 (2008)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · MLO

238in 2011

2011: 238 days median
2007high 238 (2011)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · MLO

2in 2024

2024: 2
2007high 2 (2024) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · MLO

4in 2025

2009: 52010: 12011: 12014: 12017: 12018: 12019: 12021: 12022: 12023: 12024: 22025: 4
2007high 5 (2009) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code MLO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20071—00
20080—00
20090—05
20101—01
2011323801
20121—00
20132—00
20141—01
20150—00
20160—00
20170—01
20181—01
20190—01
20202—00
20210—01
20220—01
20230—01
20241—22
20251—04
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The H-Scribe Holter system is intended to acquire, automatically analyze, edit, review, report and store prerecorded ECG data of patients that have been connected to the Mortara H-12 digital recorder or to other compatible tape or digital recorders. The cardiac data and analysis provided by H-Scribe Holter system is reviewed, confirmed, and used by trained medical personnel in the diagnosis of patients with various cardiac rhythm patterns. The H-Scribe…

Read the full statement (172 words)

The H-Scribe Holter system is intended to acquire, automatically analyze, edit, review, report and store prerecorded ECG data of patients that have been connected to the Mortara H-12 digital recorder or to other compatible tape or digital recorders. The cardiac data and analysis provided by H-Scribe Holter system is reviewed, confirmed, and used by trained medical personnel in the diagnosis of patients with various cardiac rhythm patterns.

The H-Scribe Holter system,is indicated for use in a clinical setting, by qualified medical professionals only, for patients requiring ambulatory (Holter) monitoring of 24 - 48 hours. Such monitoring is most frequently used for the purpose of prospective and retrospective cardiac data and arrhythmia analysis. The analysis software package includes, among others, detection and reporting features appropriate to the indications below:

Evaluation of adult patients with symptoms related to rhythm disturbances or symptoms suggesting arrhythmia

Evaluation of adult patients for ST segment changes

Evaluation of adult patients with pacemakers

Reporting of time domain heart rate variability

Evaluation of infant patients limited to QRS detection only

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K004017: H-Scribe.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K004017

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026