510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

MB 103 Millennium Blades

K011833510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 15, 2002248-day reviewClass I21 CFR 886.4370

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Millennium Biomedical, Inc. · HNO Keratome, Ac-Powered

Cleared on Feb 15, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K980924 (Plancon Instruments, 1998) and 1 other predicate after a 248-day review. Its family tree reaches back 3 generations to 1994.

Decided
Feb 15, 2002
Review
248 days
Class
Class I
Product code
HNO
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 3 generations to K935342 (1994). 5 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 3 generations backK935342 SCMD KeratomeS.C.M.D. Keratomes of Arizona · 1994
  2. 2 generations backK970377 Plancon Microlamellar Keratome (Single Piece Keratome Head with…Plancon Instruments · 1997
  3. 1 generation backK980924 Plancon Microlamellar Keratome EvolutionPlancon Instruments · 1998
  4. This deviceK011833 MB 103 Millennium BladesMillennium Biomedical, Inc. · 2002
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−3K935342SCMD KeratomeS.C.M.D. Keratomes of Arizona1994—
−2K970377Plancon Microlamellar Keratome (Single Piece Keratome Head with Accessories)Plancon Instruments1997—
−1K980924Plancon Microlamellar Keratome EvolutionPlancon Instruments1998—
0 (this device)K011833MB 103 Millennium BladesMillennium Biomedical, Inc.2002—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199610
200010
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K011833, 1994–2002Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HNO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K980924Plancon Microlamellar Keratome Evolution
Summary page 2
…d/or Blades the predicate device or legally marketed device or devices to which substantial equivalence is being claimed: i)evice 510(k) No. Date Cleared Moria CB Blade K980924 04-15-1998 ies Precision Edge K002849 10-18-2000 Microkeratome . Blade 206 May 22, 2001 Millennium Biomedical…
Plancon Instruments1998—
*K002849Precisionedge-Acc, Precisionedge-Acs, Precisionedge-LSK, and Precisionedge-CB…
Summary page 2
…gally marketed device or devices to which substantial equivalence is being claimed: i)evice 510(k) No. Date Cleared Moria CB Blade K980924 04-15-1998 ies Precision Edge K002849 10-18-2000 Microkeratome . Blade 206 May 22, 2001 Millennium Biomedical Inc. Premarket Notification MB 103 Mil…
Surgical Specialties Corp2000—

Also cleared against K980924: 3 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 8 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 3.0 years on median.
  • None of the 5 ancestors has a recall.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K980924.

How does its category compare?

All HNO devices

HNO Keratome, Ac-Powered: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HNO

1in 2018

2008: 12009: 12017: 12018: 1
2007high 1 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HNO

Too few HNO 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · HNO

4in 2011

2007: 22008: 22011: 4
2007high 4 (2011) · low 0 (2009)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HNO

7in 2024

2007: 322008: 312009: 852010: 842011: 902012: 1002013: 3532014: 4522015: 9662016: 1,3972017: 2,1122018: 2,2652019: 8162020: 4052021: 722022: 72023: 102024: 7
2007high 2,265 (2018) · low 0 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HNO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—232
20081—231
20091—085
20100—084
20110—490
20120—0100
20130—0353
20140—0452
20150—0966
20160—01,397
20171—02,112
20181—02,265
20190—0816
20200—0405
20210—072
20220—07
20230—010
20240—07
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

The MB 103 Millennium blade is intended to be used as a replacement blade for the Moria CB Microkeratome.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K011833: MB 103 Millennium Blades.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K011833

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026