510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2024

Modification to Synthes (Usa) Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (Ria) System

K013527510(k) SpecialCleared Dec 21, 200159-day reviewClass I21 CFR 888.4540Recalls 18

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Synthes (Usa) · HTO Reamer

Cleared on Dec 21, 2001 as substantially equivalent to K993335 (Synthes (Usa), 2000) after a 59-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 2000. It has been recalled 18 times.

Decided
Dec 21, 2001
Review
59 days
Class
Class I
Product code
HTO
Recalls
18
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K993335 (2000). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

K993335 · Synthes Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator (Ria) System · Synthes (Usa) · 2000 · recalled20002002
  1. Root · 1 generation backK993335 Synthes Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator (Ria) SystemSynthes (Usa) · 2000 · Recalled
  2. This deviceK013527 Modification to Synthes (Usa) Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (Ria) SystemSynthes (Usa) · 2001
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K993335Synthes Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator (Ria) SystemSynthes (Usa)200017
0 (this device)K013527Modification to Synthes (Usa) Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (Ria) SystemSynthes (Usa)2001—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K013527, 2000–2001Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HTO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K993335Synthes Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator (Ria) System
Summary page 1
…Aspirator (RIA) System Class II, 21 CFR 888.4540 and 888.1100 Orthopedic manual surgical instrument; Arthroscope Synthes (USA) Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (RIA) System, K993335 Synthes RIA System is a flexible reaming device that consists of a series of disposable tube assemblies, disposable reamer heads…
Synthes (Usa)200017

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jan 24, 2024Class IIZ-1237-2024Process controlProducts not sterilized, sterility cannot be confirmed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0572-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0577-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0583-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0584-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0586-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0571-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0585-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0573-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0578-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0579-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0580-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0587-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0574-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0575-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0576-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0581-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0582-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has a recall.

How does its category compare?

All HTO devices

HTO Reamer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HTO

1in 2011

2011: 1
2007high 1 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HTO

Too few HTO 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · HTO

17in 2020

2008: 12010: 212011: 22012: 32013: 12014: 12015: 12016: 72017: 72018: 12020: 17
2007high 21 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HTO

1,046in 2025

2007: 312008: 762009: 812010: 902011: 792012: 1622013: 5232014: 4052015: 6552016: 1,0392017: 1,2342018: 1,8352019: 1,9552020: 1,5312021: 4,8022022: 3,9092023: 4,4012024: 4,7462025: 1,046
2007high 4,802 (2021) · low 31 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HTO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—031
20080—176
20090—081
20100—2190
20111—279
20120—3162
20130—1523
20140—1405
20150—1655
20160—71,039
20170—71,234
20180—11,835
20190—01,955
20200—171,531
20210—04,802
20220—03,909
20230—04,401
20240—04,746
20250—01,046
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Synthes RIA System is intended to clear the medullary canal of bone marrow and debris and to effectively size the medullary canal for the acceptance of an intramedullary implant or prosthesis.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K013527: Modification to Synthes (Usa) Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (Ria) System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K013527

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026