510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2020

Synthes Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator (Ria) System

K993335510(k) TraditionalCleared Jun 12, 2000252-day reviewClass I21 CFR 888.4540Recalls 17

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Synthes (Usa) · HTO Reamer

Cleared on Jun 12, 2000 after a 252-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number. 1 later device descends from it. It has been recalled 17 times.

Decided
Jun 12, 2000
Review
252 days
Class
Class I
Product code
HTO
Recalls
17
Predicates
0

1 later device descends from it, 1 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2001: 1 descendant cleared200020052010201520202025
  1. This deviceK993335 Synthes Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator (Ria) SystemSynthes (Usa) · 2000
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 0 of its ownK013527 Modification to Synthes (Usa) Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (Ria) SystemSynthes (Usa) · 2001 · Recalled

Most influential descendants

Showing 1 of 1 · See all
  • K013527Modification to Synthes (Usa) Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (Ria) SystemSynthes (Usa) · 2001 · cites it directly0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K993335Synthes Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator (Ria) SystemSynthes (Usa)2000—
+1K013527Modification to Synthes (Usa) Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (Ria) SystemSynthes (Usa)200118

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200110
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K993335, 2000–2001Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in HTO? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*—Synthes Intramedullary Reamers
Named without a submission number
—
*—Zimmer's Flexible Intramedullary Reamer
Named without a submission number
—
*—Davol's Pneumatic Arthroscopy Pulsed Irrigator System
Named without a submission number
—

What descends from it? (1)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K013527Modification to Synthes (Usa) Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (Ria) SystemSynthes (Usa)20010

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0572-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0577-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0583-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0584-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0586-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0571-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0585-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0573-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0578-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0579-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0580-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0587-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0574-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0575-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0576-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0581-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed
Nov 19, 2020Class IIZ-0582-2021Use errorRIA 2 reamer head breakage exceeds the expected occurrence rate resulting in adverse tissue reaction, soft tissue damage, and/or bone damage, when the recommended surgical techniques are not followed

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K013527 (Synthes (Usa), 2001) has gone furthest, with 0 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All HTO devices

HTO Reamer: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · HTO

1in 2011

2011: 1
2007high 1 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · HTO

Too few HTO 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · HTO

17in 2020

2008: 12010: 212011: 22012: 32013: 12014: 12015: 12016: 72017: 72018: 12020: 17
2007high 21 (2010) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · HTO

1,046in 2025

2007: 312008: 762009: 812010: 902011: 792012: 1622013: 5232014: 4052015: 6552016: 1,0392017: 1,2342018: 1,8352019: 1,9552020: 1,5312021: 4,8022022: 3,9092023: 4,4012024: 4,7462025: 1,046
2007high 4,802 (2021) · low 31 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code HTO, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—031
20080—176
20090—081
20100—2190
20111—279
20120—3162
20130—1523
20140—1405
20150—1655
20160—71,039
20170—71,234
20180—11,835
20190—01,955
20200—171,531
20210—04,802
20220—03,909
20230—04,401
20240—04,746
20250—01,046
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

Synthes RIA System is intended to clear the medullary canal of bone marrow and debris and to effectively size the medullary canal for the acceptance of an intramedullary implant or prosthesis.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K993335: Synthes Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator (Ria) System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K993335

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026