510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Aktina Medical Physics Radiation Therapy Wedges

K014081510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 5, 200284-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.5050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Aktina Medical Physics Corp. · IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical

Cleared on Mar 5, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K862339 (Siemens Medical Laboratories, Inc., 1986) and 1 other predicate after an 84-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1983.

Decided
Mar 5, 2002
Review
84 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IYE
Recalls
None
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K832503 (1983). 2 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

Other ancestors, by year cleared 1986: 1 other ancestorK832503 · Clinac 1800 · Varian Assoc., Inc. · 198319801985199019952000
Other ancestors, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor K832503 · Clinac 1800 · Varian Assoc., Inc. · 19830
  1. Root · 1 generation backK832503 Clinac 1800Varian Assoc., Inc. · 1983
  2. This deviceK014081 Aktina Medical Physics Radiation Therapy WedgesAktina Medical Physics Corp. · 2002
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K832503Clinac 1800Varian Assoc., Inc.1983—
0 (this device)K014081Aktina Medical Physics Radiation Therapy WedgesAktina Medical Physics Corp.2002—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
198610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K014081, 1983–2002Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IYE? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IYE device

  1. #1 K252977 Halcyon, Ethos Radiotherapy System (5.0)score 18.8 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K862339Mevatron KD-2
Summary page 1
…e 9 W Congers, New York, 10920 Phone: 914-268-0101 FAX: 914-268-1700 Registration Number: 2436865 Name of Predicate Devices Mevatron KD-2, Siemens Medical Labs, Inc., K862339 Clinac 1800, Varian Associates, Inc., K832503 1 Any statement made in conjunction with this submission regarding substantial eq…
Siemens Medical Laboratories, Inc.198616
*K832503Clinac 1800
Summary page 1
…0101 FAX: 914-268-1700 Registration Number: 2436865 Name of Predicate Devices Mevatron KD-2, Siemens Medical Labs, Inc., K862339 Clinac 1800, Varian Associates, Inc., K832503 1 Any statement made in conjunction with this submission regarding substantial equivalence to any other product only relates to…
Varian Assoc., Inc.1983—

Also cleared against K862339: 1 other device →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • 1 of the 2 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • 1 other device also cites its predicate K862339.

How does its category compare?

All IYE devices

IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · IYE

12in 2025

2007: 232008: 142009: 202010: 232011: 112012: 282013: 182014: 202015: 202016: 212017: 232018: 212019: 192020: 202021: 192022: 122023: 182024: 92025: 122026 (partial year): 14
2007high 28 (2012) · low 9 (2024)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IYE

170in 2025

2007: 44 days median2008: 69 days median2009: 63 days median2010: 74 days median2011: 94 days median2012: 106 days median2013: 88 days median2014: 100 days median2015: 108 days median2016: 97 days median2017: 94 days median2018: 58 days median2019: 83 days median2020: 67 days median2021: 86 days median2022: 172 days median2023: 129 days median2024: 239 days median2025: 170 days median2026 (partial year): 120 days median
2007high 239 (2024) · low 44 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IYE

1in 2025

2007: 782008: 492009: 222010: 272011: 732012: 202013: 112014: 142015: 82016: 72017: 72018: 72019: 22020: 42021: 52022: 32023: 72024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 4
2007high 78 (2007) · low 1 (2024)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IYE

101in 2025

2007: 1552008: 1142009: 1742010: 2462011: 2802012: 1282013: 962014: 1242015: 1002016: 972017: 1252018: 852019: 912020: 742021: 682022: 662023: 1282024: 812025: 101
2007high 280 (2011) · low 66 (2022)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IYE, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007234478155
2008146949114
2009206322174
2010237427246
2011119473280
20122810620128
201318881196
20142010014124
2015201088100
20162197797
201723947125
20182158785
20191983291
20202067474
20211986568
202212172366
2023181297128
20249239181
2025121701101
2026141204—

What is it indicated for?

In radiation therapy, it is often desirable to modify the intensity or penetrating depth of a treatment beam so as to minimize radiation exposure to normal tissue. Many devices have and are used for this function including but not limited to partial beam blocks, tissue compensating filters, the most commonly, the wedge. This physical device is constructed of high-density materials that when machined into a wedge shaped block, differentially attenuate the…

Read the full statement (133 words)

In radiation therapy, it is often desirable to modify the intensity or penetrating depth of a treatment beam so as to minimize radiation exposure to normal tissue. Many devices have and are used for this function including but not limited to partial beam blocks, tissue compensating filters, the most commonly, the wedge. This physical device is constructed of high-density materials that when machined into a wedge shaped block, differentially attenuate the transmitted radiation beam. The resulting radiation beam that is transmitted through the wedge will have a sloped intensity at the patient surface as compared to an un-attenuated beam, which is uniform and consistent in intensity across the beam at the patient's surface. These wedges are designed for use only as a beam-modifying agent with photon beams in Radiation Therapy external beam treatments.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K014081: Aktina Medical Physics Radiation Therapy Wedges.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K014081

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 30, 2026 (extraction version 2d9447fa9ea4)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026