510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class II · 2017

Mevatron KD-2

K862339510(k) TraditionalCleared Oct 29, 1986131-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.5050Recalls 16

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Siemens Medical Laboratories, Inc. · IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical

Cleared on Oct 29, 1986 after a 131-day review. FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known. 18 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled 16 times.

Decided
Oct 29, 1986
Review
131 days
Class
Class II
Product code
IYE
Recalls
16
Predicates
0

18 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly.

Descendants, by year cleared 2003: 1 descendant cleared2002: 1 descendant cleared2006: 2 descendants cleared2005: 1 descendant cleared2012: 1 descendant cleared2010: 2 descendants cleared2009: 4 descendants cleared2007: 1 descendant cleared2013: 1 descendant cleared2011: 1 descendant cleared2014: 2 descendants cleared2018: 1 descendant cleared1990200020102020
  1. This deviceK862339 Mevatron KD-2Siemens Medical Laboratories, Inc. · 1986
  2. Descendant · cites it directly · 16 of its ownK031764 Oncor Avant-Garde with Coherence WorkspacesSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2003 · Recalled
  3. Descendant · 2 generations on · 13 of its ownK060226 Oncor ExpressionSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2006 · Recalled
  4. Descendant · 3 generations on · 11 of its ownK072485 Artiste MV SASiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2007 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 3 generations on · 9 of its ownK082775 Prescision OptionSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2009
  6. Descendant · 3 generations on · 7 of its ownK090683 Syngo RT Therapist ConnectSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2009 · Recalled

Showing 5 of 18 descendants. See all descendants

Descendants cleared per year

2002: 12003: 12005: 12006: 22007: 12009: 42010: 22011: 12012: 12013: 12014: 22018: 1
2002high 4 (2009) · low 0 (2004)2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 5 of 18 · See all
  • K031764Oncor Avant-Garde with Coherence WorkspacesSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2003 · cites it directly16descendants
  • K060226Oncor ExpressionSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2006 · 2 generations on13descendants
  • K072485Artiste MV SASiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2007 · 3 generations on11descendants
  • K082775Prescision OptionSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2009 · 3 generations on9descendants
  • K090683Syngo RT Therapist ConnectSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · 2009 · 3 generations on7descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
0 (this device)K862339Mevatron KD-2Siemens Medical Laboratories, Inc.1986—
+1K031764Oncor Avant-Garde with Coherence WorkspacesSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.200317
+2K060226Oncor ExpressionSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.200672
+3K072485Artiste MV SASiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.200724
+3K082775Prescision OptionSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.2009—
+3K090683Syngo RT Therapist ConnectSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.20094

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200210
200310
200510
200620
200710
200940
201020
201110
201210
201310
201420
201810
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K862339, 1986–2018Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in IYE? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new IYE device

  1. #1 K252977 Halcyon, Ethos Radiotherapy System (5.0)score 18.8 · 18 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA has not posted a summary or statement for it, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it? (18)

See all 18

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K031764Oncor Avant-Garde with Coherence WorkspacesSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.200316
K014081Aktina Medical Physics Radiation Therapy WedgesAktina Medical Physics Corp.20020

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Jan 25, 2017Class IIZ-1437-2017Under Investigation by firmSiemens became aware of a defective weld seam at overhead suspensions. Due to this defect it is possible for the weld seam to break and to cause the overhead suspension to fall down. This can lead to a severe injury to a patient or any…
Nov 4, 2010Not classifiedZ-2636-2011OtherThe firm has become aware of a potential issue that may result in a service engineer receiving an electrical shock should the connector cable housing become unfastened from the chassis.
Nov 4, 2010Not classifiedZ-2638-2011OtherThe firm has become aware of a potential issue that may result in a service engineer receiving an electrical shock should the connector cable housing become unfastened from the chassis.
Nov 4, 2010Not classifiedZ-2637-2011OtherThe firm has become aware of a potential issue that may result in a service engineer receiving an electrical shock should the connector cable housing become unfastened from the chassis.
Jan 11, 2008Not classifiedZ-1395-2008Software designLinear accelerator gantry may rotate in an unexpected direction and may cause patient injury on impact.
Dec 10, 2007Not classifiedZ-1758-2008Device DesignRadiation leak: When used with field sizes of 5cm x 5cm or smaller, product may leak radiation at a distance of 2 cm from the side of the applicator body up to 13%, in excess of IEC standards.
Dec 10, 2007Not classifiedZ-1755-2008Device DesignRadiation leak: When used with field sizes of 5cm x 5cm or smaller, product may leak radiation at a distance of 2 cm from the side of the applicator body up to 13%, in excess of IEC standards.
Dec 10, 2007Not classifiedZ-1753-2008Device DesignRadiation leak: When used with field sizes of 5cm x 5cm or smaller, product may leak radiation at a distance of 2 cm from the side of the applicator body up to 13%, in excess of IEC standards.
Dec 10, 2007Not classifiedZ-1756-2008Device DesignRadiation leak: When used with field sizes of 5cm x 5cm or smaller, product may leak radiation at a distance of 2 cm from the side of the applicator body up to 13%, in excess of IEC standards.
Dec 10, 2007Not classifiedZ-1757-2008Device DesignRadiation leak: When used with field sizes of 5cm x 5cm or smaller, product may leak radiation at a distance of 2 cm from the side of the applicator body up to 13%, in excess of IEC standards.
Dec 10, 2007Not classifiedZ-1754-2008Device DesignRadiation leak: When used with field sizes of 5cm x 5cm or smaller, product may leak radiation at a distance 2 cm from the side of the applicator body up to 13%, in excess of IEC standards.
Aug 7, 2007Not classifiedZ-0680-2008Device DesignIncorrect field size -- Products manufactured prior to 1999 may experience jaw field size errors during interlock resulting in potential mistreatment if a light field check is not performed. This problem is present in machines with serial…
Aug 7, 2007Not classifiedZ-0677-2008Device DesignIncorrect field size -- Products manufactured prior to 1999 may experience jaw field size errors during interlock resulting in potential mistreatment if a light field check is not performed. This problem is present in machines with serial…
Aug 7, 2007Not classifiedZ-0681-2008Device DesignIncorrect field size -- Products manufactured prior to 1999 may experience jaw field size errors during interlock resulting in potential mistreatment if a light field check is not performed. This problem is present in machines with serial…
Aug 7, 2007Not classifiedZ-0685-2008Device DesignIncorrect field size -- Products manufactured prior to 1999 may experience jaw field size errors during interlock resulting in potential mistreatment if a light field check is not performed. This problem is present in machines with serial…
Jul 27, 2007Not classifiedZ-0851-2008Component design/selectionDoor Hinge failures; loose or falling off (Stationary Structure Doors)

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Of its descendants, K031764 (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., 2003) has gone furthest, with 16 descendants of its own.

How does its category compare?

All IYE devices

IYE Accelerator, Linear, Medical: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · IYE

12in 2025

2007: 232008: 142009: 202010: 232011: 112012: 282013: 182014: 202015: 202016: 212017: 232018: 212019: 192020: 202021: 192022: 122023: 182024: 92025: 122026 (partial year): 14
2007high 28 (2012) · low 9 (2024)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · IYE

170in 2025

2007: 44 days median2008: 69 days median2009: 63 days median2010: 74 days median2011: 94 days median2012: 106 days median2013: 88 days median2014: 100 days median2015: 108 days median2016: 97 days median2017: 94 days median2018: 58 days median2019: 83 days median2020: 67 days median2021: 86 days median2022: 172 days median2023: 129 days median2024: 239 days median2025: 170 days median2026 (partial year): 120 days median
2007high 239 (2024) · low 44 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · IYE

1in 2025

2007: 782008: 492009: 222010: 272011: 732012: 202013: 112014: 142015: 82016: 72017: 72018: 72019: 22020: 42021: 52022: 32023: 72024: 12025: 12026 (partial year): 4
2007high 78 (2007) · low 1 (2024)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · IYE

101in 2025

2007: 1552008: 1142009: 1742010: 2462011: 2802012: 1282013: 962014: 1242015: 1002016: 972017: 1252018: 852019: 912020: 742021: 682022: 662023: 1282024: 812025: 101
2007high 280 (2011) · low 66 (2022)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code IYE, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007234478155
2008146949114
2009206322174
2010237427246
2011119473280
20122810620128
201318881196
20142010014124
2015201088100
20162197797
201723947125
20182158785
20191983291
20202067474
20211986568
202212172366
2023181297128
20249239181
2025121701101
2026141204—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K862339: Mevatron KD-2.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K862339

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026