510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Starflow HV

K020760510(k) TraditionalCleared May 3, 200257-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3690

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Danville Materials, Inc. · EBF Material, Tooth Shade, Resin

Cleared on May 3, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K013647 (Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc., 2002) and 2 other predicates after a 57-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1999.

Decided: May 3, 2002
Review: 57 days
Class: Class II
Product code: EBF
Recalls: None
Predicates: 3

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K990108 (1999). 3 ancestors in all. No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

By dateBy generation

Root · 1 generation backK990108 LC FlowfillS & C Polymer GmbH · 1999
This deviceK020760 Starflow HVDanville Materials, Inc. · 2002

View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

Generation	Number	Device	Applicant	Decided	Recalls
−1	K990108	LC Flowfill	S & C Polymer GmbH	1999	—
0 (this device)	K020760	Starflow HV	Danville Materials, Inc.	2002	—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year cleared	Devices	With a Class I recall
1999	1	0
2002	1	0

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K020760, 1999–2002Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EBF? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new EBF device

#1 K202846 Tera Harzscore 18.5 · 7 generations · no Class I recall
#2 Held for the reportin the report
#3 Held for the reportin the report

Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

Type	Number	Device	Applicant	Decided	Recalls
*	K013647	Revolution Formula 2 Summary page 1 …ble dental restorative. The device is substantially equivalent to other legally marketed devices in the United States including Revolution by Sybron Dental Specialties (K013647), StarFlow by Danville Materials Inc (K990108), and Tetric Flow (K 993783) by Ivoclar Vivadent. The primary differences are very…	Sybron Dental Specialties, Inc.	2002	1
*	K990108	LC Flowfill Summary page 1 …tially equivalent to other legally marketed devices in the United States including Revolution by Sybron Dental Specialties (K013647), StarFlow by Danville Materials Inc (K990108), and Tetric Flow (K 993783) by Ivoclar Vivadent. The primary differences are very minor changes to the material composition. St…	S & C Polymer GmbH	1999	—
*	K993783	Tetric Flow Summary page 1 …legally marketed devices in the United States including Revolution by Sybron Dental Specialties (K013647), StarFlow by Danville Materials Inc (K990108), and Tetric Flow (K 993783) by Ivoclar Vivadent. The primary differences are very minor changes to the material composition. Starflow HV is intended for us…	Ivoclar North America, Inc.	1999	—

Also cleared against K013647: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

1 of the 3 ancestors has a recall of any class.
2 other devices also cite its predicate K013647.

How does its category compare?

All EBF devices

EBF Material, Tooth Shade, Resin: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EBF

15in 2025

2007high 20 (2009) · low 9 (2023)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · EBF

43in 2025

2007high 205 (2016) · low 43 (2025)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · EBF

1in 2020

2007high 42 (2008) · low 0 (2012)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · EBF

1in 2025

2007high 246 (2013) · low 1 (2025)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EBF, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table

Year	Decisions	Median 510(k) review, days	Recalls (Class I)	MAUDE reports
2007	19	49	1	6
2008	14	79	42	10
2009	20	84	1	8
2010	19	75	6	31
2011	19	81	7	31
2012	11	86	0	62
2013	13	153	0	246
2014	10	112	0	195
2015	17	123	0	119
2016	20	205	0	143
2017	15	108	4	42
2018	15	115	0	8
2019	17	159	2	11
2020	15	190	1	2
2021	13	178	0	2
2022	17	63	0	2
2023	9	87	0	8
2024	18	120	0	5
2025	15	43	0	1
2026	16	59	2	—

What is it indicated for?

Starflow HV is intended for use for the restoration of Class III, Class IV, and Class V cavities, small Class I cavities not in occlusion, repair of enamel defects, repair of porcelain restorations, minor occusal build-ups in non-stress bearing areas, pit and fissure sealant, cement for seramic/composite veneers, incisal abrasions, and core build-ups.

Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.

https://510kreport.com/device/K020760 · printed Nov 5, 2026

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K020760: Starflow HV.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K020760

Report an extraction error

Are you the manufacturer?

Record history

FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
Page last updated Nov 3, 2026