510(k) · Cleared
ClearedPhilips TL 20W/01RS UV-B, Philips PL-S 9W/01/2P UV, and Philips PL-L 36W/01/4P UV-B
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Philips Lighting Co. · FTC Light, Ultraviolet, Dermatological
Cleared on May 16, 2002 after a 42-day review. The FDA summary names its predicate without a number.
- Decided
- May 16, 2002
- Review
- 42 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- FTC
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 0
The FDA summary names its predicate without a number.
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in FTC? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new FTC device
- #1 K242977 308nm Excimer Phototherapy Device (CN-308E…score 14.8 · 21 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (1)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | — | Philips TL100W/01 UV-B Named without a submission number |
What descends from it?
No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
How does its category compare?
All FTC devicesFTC Light, Ultraviolet, Dermatological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · FTC
3in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · FTC
76in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · FTC
3so far in 2026, the most since 2007
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · FTC
8in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code FTC, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 4 | 53 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 3 | 41 | 1 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 5 | 125 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 2 | — | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 3 | 98 | 0 | 8 |
| 2016 | 1 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 2 | — | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 3 | 88 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2 | — | 0 | 14 |
| 2020 | 5 | 237 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 3 | 89 | 0 | 48 |
| 2022 | 1 | — | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 4 | 48 | 0 | 5 |
| 2024 | 1 | — | 0 | 4 |
| 2025 | 3 | 76 | 1 | 8 |
| 2026 | 4 | 91 | 3 | — |
What is it indicated for?
The intended function of the UV-B ultraviolet lamp is therapy for Psoriasis and Vitiligo.
Indications for use read by OCR from a scanned FDA summary, so letters may be misread. Check the PDF before quoting it.
https://510kreport.com/device/K021092 · printed Nov 4, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K021092: Philips TL 20W/01RS UV-B, Philips PL-S 9W/01/2P UV, and Philips PL-L 36W/01/4P UV-B.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K021092
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026