510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Cleo TL80W Professional Cleo TL80W Professional R, Cleo TL100 W Professional

K940672510(k) TraditionalCleared Mar 18, 199430-day reviewClass II21 CFR 878.4635

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Philips Lighting Co. · LEJ Booth, Sun Tan

Cleared on Mar 18, 1994 after a 30-day review. FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known.

Decided
Mar 18, 1994
Review
30 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LEJ
Recalls
None
Predicates
0

FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known.

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K940672Source: FDA 510(k) database · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LEJ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LEJ device

  1. #1 K221523 Tanning Lampscore 5.2 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against?

FDA lists a 510(k) statement for it but has not posted the file, so its predicates are not known.

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

How does its category compare?

All LEJ devices

LEJ Booth, Sun Tan: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LEJ

1in 2023

2009: 12015: 92016: 112017: 12018: 62019: 32022: 12023: 1
2007high 11 (2016) · low 0 (2007)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LEJ

105in 2019

2015: 102 days median2016: 247 days median2018: 106 days median2019: 105 days median
2007high 247 (2016) · low 102 (2015)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LEJ

1in 2017

2017: 1
2007high 1 (2017) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LEJ

1in 2025

2008: 12009: 12011: 22012: 292013: 42014: 92015: 42017: 92018: 42019: 12020: 32022: 42023: 22024: 22025: 1
2007high 29 (2012) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LEJ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—01
20091—01
20100—00
20110—02
20120—029
20130—04
20140—09
2015910204
20161124700
20171—19
2018610604
2019310501
20200—03
20210—00
20221—04
20231—02
20240—02
20250—01
20260—0—
Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K940672: Cleo TL80W Professional Cleo TL80W Professional R, Cleo TL100 W Professional.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K940672

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026