510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Lucius 62

K021948510(k) TraditionalCleared Sep 3, 200282-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3060

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Lucius Metals Com. · EJT Alloy, Gold-Based Noble Metal

Cleared on Sep 3, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K874308 (Jelenko Co., 1988) after an 82-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1988.

Decided: Sep 3, 2002
Review: 82 days
Class: Class II
Product code: EJT
Recalls: None
Predicates: 1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K874308 (1988). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

By dateBy generation

Root · 1 generation backK874308 JEL-62Jelenko Co. · 1988
This deviceK021948 Lucius 62Lucius Metals Com. · 2002

View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

Generation	Number	Device	Applicant	Decided	Recalls
−1	K874308	JEL-62	Jelenko Co.	1988	—
0 (this device)	K021948	Lucius 62	Lucius Metals Com.	2002	—

FIG. 1 — Lineage of K021948, 1988–2002Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EJT? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report

Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

Type	Number	Device	Applicant	Decided	Recalls
*	K874308	JEL-62 Summary page 1 …alloys for clinical use Product code: EJT Classification: Class II Legally marketed device: Jel-62 51O(k) number: K874308 Test methods applied: as in ANSVADA 5 and I S 0 9693 Comparison of composition: Au(%) Pt(%) Pd(%)…	Jelenko Co.	1988	—

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

Its one ancestor has no recall.

How does its category compare?

All EJT devices

EJT Alloy, Gold-Based Noble Metal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EJT

FDA has decided no EJT device since 2007.

Median 510(k) review, days · EJT

Too few EJT 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · EJT

No recall names EJT since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · EJT

1in 2017

2007high 1 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EJT, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table

Year	Median 510(k) review, days	MAUDE reports
2007	—	0
2008	—	0
2009	—	0
2010	—	0
2011	—	1
2012	—	0
2013	—	0
2014	—	1
2015	—	0
2016	—	1
2017	—	1
2018	—	0
2019	—	0
2020	—	0
2021	—	0
2022	—	0
2023	—	0
2024	—	0
2025	—	0
2026	—	—

What is it indicated for?

LUClUS 62 is intended for manufacturing:

- Inlay / Onlays

- Crowns

- Short span bridges

- Long span bridges

- Removable partials

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

https://510kreport.com/device/K021948 · printed Nov 4, 2026

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K021948: Lucius 62.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 4, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K021948

Report an extraction error

Are you the manufacturer?

Record history

FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
Page last updated Nov 3, 2026