510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Recalled · Class I · 2013

Embol-X Aortic Filters,Etra-Small,Small,Medium,Large,Extra Large,Models CF26000.CF29000,CF32000,CF35000,CF4000

K022071510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 14, 2003233-day reviewClass II21 CFR 870.4260Recalls 1 (1 Class I)

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Embol-X, Inc. · DTM Filter, Blood, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Arterial Line

Cleared on Feb 14, 2003 as substantially equivalent to K003992 (Percu Surge, Inc., 2001) and 1 other predicate after a 233-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1982. 1 of the 6 devices in its family, counting itself, has a Class I recall. 3 later devices descend from it. It has been recalled once, including a Class I recall.

Decided
Feb 14, 2003
Review
233 days
Class
Class II
Product code
DTM
Recalls
1 (1 Class I)
Predicates
2

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K820044 (1982). 2 ancestors in all. 3 later devices descend from it, 2 citing it directly. 1 of the 6 devices in this family, counting this one, has a Class I recall.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2001: 1 other ancestor2015: 1 descendant cleared2003: 1 descendant cleared2019: 1 descendant clearedK820044 · Arterial Blood Filter, #AF-1025 · Bentley Laboratories, Inc. · 198219801990200020102020
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 1 other ancestor 1 generation forward: 2 descendants2 generations forward: 1 descendant K820044 · Arterial Blood Filter, #AF-1025 · Bentley Laboratories, Inc. · 19820
  1. Root · 1 generation backK820044 Arterial Blood Filter, #AF-1025Bentley Laboratories, Inc. · 1982
  2. This deviceK022071 Embol-X Aortic Filters,Etra-Small,Small,Medium,Large,Extra…Embol-X, Inc. · 2003
  3. Descendant · cites it directly · 2 of its ownK031946 Embol-X Intra-Aortic Filter: Extra-Small, Small, Medium, Large…Edwards Lifesciences, LLC · 2003
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK141465 Cardiogard Emboli Protection CannulaCardiogard Medical, Ltd. · 2015
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK182302 CardioGard Emboli Protection CannulaCardiogard Medical, Ltd. · 2019

Most influential descendants

Showing 3 of 3 · See all
  • K031946Embol-X Intra-Aortic Filter: Extra-Small, Small, Medium, Large, Extra-LargeEdwards Lifesciences, LLC · 2003 · cites it directly2descendants
  • K141465Cardiogard Emboli Protection CannulaCardiogard Medical, Ltd. · 2015 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K182302CardioGard Emboli Protection CannulaCardiogard Medical, Ltd. · 2019 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K820044Arterial Blood Filter, #AF-1025Bentley Laboratories, Inc.1982—
0 (this device)K022071Embol-X Aortic Filters,Etra-Small,Small,Medium,Large,Extra Large,Models…Embol-X, Inc.2003—
+1K031946Embol-X Intra-Aortic Filter: Extra-Small, Small, Medium, Large, Extra-LargeEdwards Lifesciences, LLC2003—
+1K141465Cardiogard Emboli Protection CannulaCardiogard Medical, Ltd.2015—
+2K182302CardioGard Emboli Protection CannulaCardiogard Medical, Ltd.2019—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200110

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200310
201510
201910
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K022071, 1982–2019Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

1 device in this family has a Class I recall. A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new DTM device

  1. #1 K251744 Affinity Pixie™ Arterial Filter with Balance™…score 11.0 · 2 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (2)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K003992Percusurge Guardwire Temporary Occlusion and Aspiration System
Summary page 2
…ity and biocompatibility, and performance to the Medtronic PercuSurge Guardwire Plus Temporary Occlusion and Aspiration System (K003992) and/or the Edwards Lifesciences AF- 1025D/AF-1040D Duraflo (heparin treated) Arterial…
Percu Surge, Inc.2001—
*K820044Arterial Blood Filter, #AF-1025
Summary page 2
…Aspiration System (K003992) and/or the Edwards Lifesciences AF- 1025D/AF-1040D Duraflo (heparin treated) Arterial Blood Filter (K820044). Technological The EMB0L.X Aortic Filter has similar intended use, design intent, Characteristics: principle of operat…
Bentley Laboratories, Inc.1982—

Also cleared against K003992: 2 other devices →

What descends from it? (3)

2 later devices cite it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K031946Embol-X Intra-Aortic Filter: Extra-Small, Small, Medium, Large, Extra-LargeEdwards Lifesciences, LLC20032
K141465Cardiogard Emboli Protection CannulaCardiogard Medical, Ltd.20151

Has anything in its family been recalled? (1 Class I)

Recalls of this device

DateClassRecallRoot causeReason
Sep 16, 2013Class IZ-0091-2014Nonconforming Material/ComponentEdwards Lifesciences is recalling certain lots of EMBOL-X Glide Protection System due to deformation of the cannula tip.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • None of the 2 ancestors has a recall.
  • Of its descendants, K031946 (Edwards Lifesciences, LLC, 2003) has gone furthest, with 2 descendants of its own.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K003992.

How does its category compare?

All DTM devices

DTM Filter, Blood, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Arterial Line: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · DTM

2in 2024

2007: 32008: 12009: 52010: 22011: 12012: 22013: 12023: 12024: 22026 (partial year): 1
2007high 5 (2009) · low 0 (2014)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · DTM

246in 2009

2007: 60 days median2009: 246 days median
2007high 246 (2009) · low 60 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · DTM

1in 2019

2008: 12019: 1
2007high 1 (2008) · low 0 (2007)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · DTM

4in 2024

2007: 82008: 22010: 32011: 82012: 62013: 92014: 642015: 342016: 272017: 152018: 232019: 52020: 12021: 12022: 42024: 4
2007high 64 (2014) · low 0 (2009)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code DTM, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
200736008
20081—12
2009524600
20102—03
20111—08
20122—06
20131—09
20140—064
20150—034
20160—027
20170—015
20180—023
20190—15
20200—01
20210—01
20220—04
20231—00
20242—04
20250—00
20261—0—

What is it indicated for?

The EMBOL-X Aortic Filter is indicated for use with the EMBOL-X Aortic Cannula in cardiac surgery procedures to capture and remove particulate emboli from the ascending aorta and heart during and following cross clamp removal in patients aged 60 years and older undergoing first time non-emergent CABG or isolated aortic or mitral valve repair/replacement.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K022071: Embol-X Aortic Filters,Etra-Small,Small,Medium,Large,Extra Large,Models CF26000.CF29000,CF32000,CF35000,CF4000.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K022071

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026