510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Observer Ultrasound Reporting and Imaging System

K022877510(k) TraditionalCleared Feb 5, 2003159-day reviewClass II21 CFR 892.2050

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Vision Chips, Inc. · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological

Cleared on Feb 5, 2003 as substantially equivalent to K963610 (A.L.I. Technologies, Inc., 1996) and 2 other predicates after a 159-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1996. 2 later devices descend from it.

Decided
Feb 5, 2003
Review
159 days
Class
Class II
Product code
LLZ
Recalls
None
Predicates
3

Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K955092 (1996). 4 ancestors in all. 2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.

Other ancestors, by year clearedDescendants, by year cleared 2000: 1 other ancestor1997: 1 other ancestor2005: 1 descendant cleared2026: 1 descendant clearedK955092 · Accurad Image Management System, Autorad, Regustration Station, Archive Server, Print Spooler, Analog & Digital Acquire · Cemax-Icon, Inc. · 1996K963610 · Aki Compacs Data Compresion Module for Diagnostic Images · A.L.I. Technologies, Inc. · 19961995200020052010201520202025
Other ancestors, by generationDescendants, by generation 1 generation back: 2 other ancestors 1 generation forward: 1 descendant2 generations forward: 1 descendant K963610 · Aki Compacs Data Compresion Module for Diagnostic Images · A.L.I. Technologies, Inc. · 1996K955092 · Accurad Image Management System, Autorad, Regustration Station, Archive Server, Print Spooler, Analog & Digital Acquire · Cemax-Icon, Inc. · 19960
  1. Root · 2 generations backK955092 Accurad Image Management System, Autorad, Regustration Station…Cemax-Icon, Inc. · 1996
  2. 1 generation backK963610 Aki Compacs Data Compresion Module for Diagnostic ImagesA.L.I. Technologies, Inc. · 1996
  3. This deviceK022877 Observer Ultrasound Reporting and Imaging SystemVision Chips, Inc. · 2003
  4. Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK051639 AS-Obgyn Information System; as-Emr SystemAs Software, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
  5. Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK260205 AS Software Version AseraAS Software, LLC · 2026

Most influential descendants

Showing 2 of 2 · See all
  • K051639AS-Obgyn Information System; as-Emr SystemAs Software, Inc. · 2005 · cites it directly1descendant
  • K260205AS Software Version AseraAS Software, LLC · 2026 · 2 generations on0descendants
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−2K955092Accurad Image Management System, Autorad, Regustration Station, Archive…Cemax-Icon, Inc.1996—
−1K963610Aki Compacs Data Compresion Module for Diagnostic ImagesA.L.I. Technologies, Inc.1996—
0 (this device)K022877Observer Ultrasound Reporting and Imaging SystemVision Chips, Inc.2003—
+1K051639AS-Obgyn Information System; as-Emr SystemAs Software, Inc.20051
+2K260205AS Software Version AseraAS Software, LLC2026—

Other ancestors by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
199710
200010

Descendants by year cleared

Year clearedDevicesWith a Class I recall
200510
202610
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K022877, 1996–2026Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device

  1. #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
  2. #2 Held for the reportin the report
  3. #3 Held for the reportin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (3)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K963610Aki Compacs Data Compresion Module for Diagnostic Images
Summary page 2
…al Equivalence: OBserver Ultrasound Reporting and Imaging System is substantially equivalent to the following legally-marketed devices: 1) ALI Ultras PACS and comPACS (K963610) 2) R4's Remote Fetal Medicine Ultrasound System. (K000443) 3) Digisonics OB-View (K970402) OBserver Ultrasound Reporting & Imagi…
A.L.I. Technologies, Inc.1996—
*K000443Remote Fetal Medicine Ultrasound System
Summary page 2
…System is substantially equivalent to the following legally-marketed devices: 1) ALI Ultras PACS and comPACS (K963610) 2) R4's Remote Fetal Medicine Ultrasound System. (K000443) 3) Digisonics OB-View (K970402) OBserver Ultrasound Reporting & Imaging System, like R4's Remote Fetal Medicine Ultrasound Syste…
R4 Telemedicine, Inc.2000—
*K970402Doctors Review System
Summary page 2
…nt to the following legally-marketed devices: 1) ALI Ultras PACS and comPACS (K963610) 2) R4's Remote Fetal Medicine Ultrasound System. (K000443) 3) Digisonics OB-View (K970402) OBserver Ultrasound Reporting & Imaging System, like R4's Remote Fetal Medicine Ultrasound System, Digisonics' OB-View, and ALI'…
Digisonics, Inc.19975

Also cleared against K963610: 3 other devices →

What descends from it? (2)

1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.

NumberDeviceApplicantDecidedDescendants
K051639AS-Obgyn Information System; as-Emr SystemAs Software, Inc.20051

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • The line of descent spans 7 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.2 years on median.
  • 1 of the 4 ancestors has a recall of any class.
  • Of its descendants, K051639 (As Software, Inc., 2005) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
  • 3 other devices also cite its predicate K963610.

How does its category compare?

All LLZ devices

LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · LLZ

58in 2025

2007: 762008: 942009: 702010: 512011: 1062012: 822013: 952014: 782015: 642016: 822017: 782018: 1042019: 742020: 812021: 832022: 652023: 872024: 622025: 582026 (partial year): 45
2007high 106 (2011) · low 51 (2010)2026

2026 to Oct 25, outlined.

Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ

173in 2025

2007: 36 days median2008: 52 days median2009: 62 days median2010: 98 days median2011: 79 days median2012: 87 days median2013: 84 days median2014: 89 days median2015: 90 days median2016: 90 days median2017: 107 days median2018: 105 days median2019: 107 days median2020: 115 days median2021: 116 days median2022: 137 days median2023: 157 days median2024: 131 days median2025: 173 days median2026 (partial year): 110 days median
2007high 173 (2025) · low 36 (2007)2026

Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.

Recalls per year · LLZ

11in 2025

2007: 202008: 322009: 212010: 172011: 302012: 122013: 642014: 62015: 162016: 122017: 52018: 72019: 22020: 62021: 32022: 42023: 82024: 62025: 112026 (partial year): 14
2007high 64 (2013) · low 2 (2019)2026

Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified

Adverse event reports per year · LLZ

116in 2025

2007: 1522008: 1542009: 1452010: 1452011: 4542012: 2662013: 1,1302014: 15,6312015: 2112016: 2902017: 1042018: 722019: 882020: 822021: 702022: 282023: 262024: 422025: 116
2007high 15,631 (2014) · low 26 (2023)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
2007763620152
2008945232154
2009706221145
2010519817145
20111067930454
2012828712266
20139584641,130
20147889615,631
2015649016211
2016829012290
2017781075104
2018104105772
201974107288
202081115682
202183116370
202265137428
202387157826
202462131642
20255817311116
20264511014—

What is it indicated for?

OBserver Ultrasound Reporting and Imaging System is intended to automate and enhance the process by which ultrasound examination information is entered and reported and by which ultrasound images are stored and reviewed by physicians in the field of maternal-fetal medicine. The system also provides significant research data for academic institutions.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K022877: Observer Ultrasound Reporting and Imaging System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K022877

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026