510(k) · Cleared
ClearedObserver Ultrasound Reporting and Imaging System
Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly
Vision Chips, Inc. · LLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological
Cleared on Feb 5, 2003 as substantially equivalent to K963610 (A.L.I. Technologies, Inc., 1996) and 2 other predicates after a 159-day review. Its family tree reaches back 2 generations to 1996. 2 later devices descend from it.
- Decided
- Feb 5, 2003
- Review
- 159 days
- Class
- Class II
- Product code
- LLZ
- Recalls
- None
- Predicates
- 3
Its longest line of descent runs back 2 generations to K955092 (1996). 4 ancestors in all. 2 later devices descend from it, 1 citing it directly.
- Root · 2 generations backK955092 Accurad Image Management System, Autorad, Regustration Station…Cemax-Icon, Inc. · 1996
- 1 generation backK963610 Aki Compacs Data Compresion Module for Diagnostic ImagesA.L.I. Technologies, Inc. · 1996
- This deviceK022877 Observer Ultrasound Reporting and Imaging SystemVision Chips, Inc. · 2003
- Descendant · cites it directly · 1 of its ownK051639 AS-Obgyn Information System; as-Emr SystemAs Software, Inc. · 2005 · Recalled
- Descendant · 2 generations on · 0 of its ownK260205 AS Software Version AseraAS Software, LLC · 2026
Most influential descendants
Showing 2 of 2 · See allView FIG. 1 as a table
Line of descent and top descendants
| Generation | Number | Device | Applicant | Decided | Recalls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −2 | K955092 | Accurad Image Management System, Autorad, Regustration Station, Archive… | Cemax-Icon, Inc. | 1996 | — |
| −1 | K963610 | Aki Compacs Data Compresion Module for Diagnostic Images | A.L.I. Technologies, Inc. | 1996 | — |
| 0 (this device) | K022877 | Observer Ultrasound Reporting and Imaging System | Vision Chips, Inc. | 2003 | — |
| +1 | K051639 | AS-Obgyn Information System; as-Emr System | As Software, Inc. | 2005 | 1 |
| +2 | K260205 | AS Software Version Asera | AS Software, LLC | 2026 | — |
Other ancestors by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 1997 | 1 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 | 0 |
Descendants by year cleared
| Year cleared | Devices | With a Class I recall |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 1 | 0 |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 |
Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.
Planning a device in LLZ? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.
Top candidate predicates for a new LLZ device
- #1 K230955 syngo Application Softwarescore 21.5 · 11 generations · no Class I recall
- #2 Held for the reportin the report
- #3 Held for the reportin the report
What was it cleared against? (3)
Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.
| Type | Number | Device | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|
| * | K963610 | Aki Compacs Data Compresion Module for Diagnostic ImagesSummary page 2…al Equivalence: OBserver Ultrasound Reporting and Imaging System is substantially equivalent to the following legally-marketed devices: 1) ALI Ultras PACS and comPACS (K963610) 2) R4's Remote Fetal Medicine Ultrasound System. (K000443) 3) Digisonics OB-View (K970402) OBserver Ultrasound Reporting & Imagi… | 1996 |
| * | K000443 | Remote Fetal Medicine Ultrasound SystemSummary page 2…System is substantially equivalent to the following legally-marketed devices: 1) ALI Ultras PACS and comPACS (K963610) 2) R4's Remote Fetal Medicine Ultrasound System. (K000443) 3) Digisonics OB-View (K970402) OBserver Ultrasound Reporting & Imaging System, like R4's Remote Fetal Medicine Ultrasound Syste… | 2000 |
| * | K970402 | Doctors Review SystemSummary page 2…nt to the following legally-marketed devices: 1) ALI Ultras PACS and comPACS (K963610) 2) R4's Remote Fetal Medicine Ultrasound System. (K000443) 3) Digisonics OB-View (K970402) OBserver Ultrasound Reporting & Imaging System, like R4's Remote Fetal Medicine Ultrasound System, Digisonics' OB-View, and ALI'… | 1997 |
What descends from it? (2)
1 later device cites it directly; ranked here by how many devices descend from each in turn.
| Number | Device | Decided | Descendants |
|---|---|---|---|
| K051639 | AS-Obgyn Information System; as-Emr System | 2005 | 1 |
Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)
No FDA recall names this device.
No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.
What does this lineage say?
- The line of descent spans 7 years and passes through 3 companies; a new generation was cleared every 6.2 years on median.
- 1 of the 4 ancestors has a recall of any class.
- Of its descendants, K051639 (As Software, Inc., 2005) has gone furthest, with 1 descendant of its own.
- 3 other devices also cite its predicate K963610.
How does its category compare?
All LLZ devicesLLZ System, Image Processing, Radiological: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.
FDA decisions per year · LLZ
58in 2025
2026 to Oct 25, outlined.
Median 510(k) review, days · LLZ
173in 2025
Receipt to decision; years with fewer than 3 clearances left blank.
Recalls per year · LLZ
11in 2025
Class I (0 since 2007) Class II/III not classified
Adverse event reports per year · LLZ
116in 2025
MAUDE reports naming product code LLZ, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.
View these four charts as a table
| Year | Decisions | Median 510(k) review, days | Recalls (Class I) | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 76 | 36 | 20 | 152 |
| 2008 | 94 | 52 | 32 | 154 |
| 2009 | 70 | 62 | 21 | 145 |
| 2010 | 51 | 98 | 17 | 145 |
| 2011 | 106 | 79 | 30 | 454 |
| 2012 | 82 | 87 | 12 | 266 |
| 2013 | 95 | 84 | 64 | 1,130 |
| 2014 | 78 | 89 | 6 | 15,631 |
| 2015 | 64 | 90 | 16 | 211 |
| 2016 | 82 | 90 | 12 | 290 |
| 2017 | 78 | 107 | 5 | 104 |
| 2018 | 104 | 105 | 7 | 72 |
| 2019 | 74 | 107 | 2 | 88 |
| 2020 | 81 | 115 | 6 | 82 |
| 2021 | 83 | 116 | 3 | 70 |
| 2022 | 65 | 137 | 4 | 28 |
| 2023 | 87 | 157 | 8 | 26 |
| 2024 | 62 | 131 | 6 | 42 |
| 2025 | 58 | 173 | 11 | 116 |
| 2026 | 45 | 110 | 14 | — |
What is it indicated for?
OBserver Ultrasound Reporting and Imaging System is intended to automate and enhance the process by which ultrasound examination information is entered and reported and by which ultrasound images are stored and reviewed by physicians in the field of maternal-fetal medicine. The system also provides significant research data for academic institutions.
Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.
https://510kreport.com/device/K022877 · printed Nov 5, 2026
Cite this page
510(k) Report. “K022877: Observer Ultrasound Reporting and Imaging System.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 5, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K022877
Report an extraction error
Are you the manufacturer?
Record history
- FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
- Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
- Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
- Page last updated Nov 3, 2026