510(k) Report

510(k) · Cleared

Cleared

Ceranum 76

K023200510(k) TraditionalCleared Nov 4, 200240-day reviewClass II21 CFR 872.3060

Data to Oct 25, 2026 (FDA decisions) Oct 12, 2026 (recalls) Sep 30, 2026 (MAUDE) refreshed weekly, last Nov 3, 2026

Sb Lucius, Inc. · EJT Alloy, Gold-Based Noble Metal

Cleared on Nov 4, 2002 as substantially equivalent to K993508 (Metalor Dental USA Corp., 1999) after a 40-day review. Its family tree reaches back 1 generation to 1999.

Decided
Nov 4, 2002
Review
40 days
Class
Class II
Product code
EJT
Recalls
None
Predicates
1

Its longest line of descent runs back 1 generation to K993508 (1999). No later device cites it as a predicate yet.

  1. Root · 1 generation backK993508 V-Supra Plus, Alloy NO. 5025Metalor Dental USA Corp. · 1999
  2. This deviceK023200 Ceranum 76Sb Lucius, Inc. · 2002
View FIG. 1 as a table

Line of descent and top descendants

GenerationNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
−1K993508V-Supra Plus, Alloy NO. 5025Metalor Dental USA Corp.1999—
0 (this device)K023200Ceranum 76Sb Lucius, Inc.2002—
FIG. 1 — Lineage of K023200, 1999–2002Source: FDA 510(k) summaries, read by 510(k) Report · How lineage is built

Get the monthly Device Review Tracker

Notable FDA decisions, review times and new Class I recalls. See an issue.

Sources: FDA 510(k) database (decision fields), the FDA summary (predicates and indications), FDA recall and enforcement reports, and MAUDE; processed by 510(k) Report. Verify on FDA.gov · Methodology and accuracy.

Planning a device in EJT? A 510(k) Report weighs predicate choices, recall history and review times for a new device like this one.

  • Candidate predicates for a device like this, rankedin the report
  • Recall history across each candidate’s familyin the report
Get a 510(k) Report

What was it cleared against? (1)

Devices the submitter claimed this one is substantially equivalent to (*), and reference devices cited for a specific test or feature (†), as written in the FDA summary.

TypeNumberDeviceApplicantDecidedRecalls
*K993508V-Supra Plus, Alloy NO. 5025
Summary page 1
…clinical use Product code: EJT Classification: Class II Legally marketed device: Metalor’s V-Supra Plus 51O(k) number: K993508 SUMMARY OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS Test methods applied: as in ANSVADA 5 and IS0 9693 Comparison of composition:…
Metalor Dental USA Corp.1999—

Also cleared against K993508: 2 other devices →

What descends from it?

No later submission names this one as a predicate yet.

Has anything in its family been recalled? (0 Class I)

No FDA recall names this device.

No ancestor or descendant has a Class I recall.

What does this lineage say?

  • Its one ancestor has no recall.
  • 2 other devices also cite its predicate K993508.

How does its category compare?

All EJT devices

EJT Alloy, Gold-Based Noble Metal: FDA decisions, review times, recalls and adverse event reports over 20 years.

FDA decisions per year · EJT

FDA has decided no EJT device since 2007.

Median 510(k) review, days · EJT

Too few EJT 510(k)s in any year since 2007 to give a median.

Recalls per year · EJT

No recall names EJT since 2007.

Adverse event reports per year · EJT

1in 2017

2011: 12014: 12016: 12017: 1
2007high 1 (2011) · low 0 (2007)2025

MAUDE reports naming product code EJT, not matched to any one device; reports are not rates.

View these four charts as a table
YearDecisionsMedian 510(k) review, daysRecalls (Class I)MAUDE reports
20070—00
20080—00
20090—00
20100—00
20110—01
20120—00
20130—00
20140—01
20150—00
20160—01
20170—01
20180—00
20190—00
20200—00
20210—00
20220—00
20230—00
20240—00
20250—00
20260—0—

What is it indicated for?

This is a yellow ceramic alloy for single units, implants prosthetics, single & 3/4 crowns, and short span bridges.

Indications for use as stated in the FDA summary.

Cite this page

510(k) Report. “K023200: Ceranum 76.” Lineage record from FDA 510(k) data and the FDA summary. Updated Nov 3, 2026. Accessed Nov 6, 2026. https://510kreport.com/device/K023200

Report an extraction error

Tell us what is wrong; we check it against the FDA summary.

Are you the manufacturer?

Send a correction or an update to this page, for example a newer model or a public statement about a recall.

Record history
  • FDA decision record loaded May 2, 2026
  • Summary read Oct 13, 2026 (extraction version 9eaa42aa01ed)
  • Lineage and recalls computed Nov 3, 2026
  • Page last updated Nov 3, 2026